Suppr超能文献

动态测量与偶测法评估缓释维拉帕米与卡托普利治疗轻至中度动脉高血压的疗效比较

[Comparative efficacy of sustained release verapamil and captopril in mild to moderate arterial hypertension by ambulatory measurement and occasional measurement].

作者信息

Drici M D, Teboul B, Lapalus P, Morand P, Atlan J P, Bouche J M, Ceccaldi J P, Giacomoni S, Halimi G, Passeron-Seître M

机构信息

Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Expérimentale et Clinique, Faculté de Médecine de Nice.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1991 Nov;40(9):567-70.

PMID:1776803
Abstract

The evaluation of mild to moderate hypertension must be carried out under the conditions in which treatments are usually prescribed, i.e., in general practice. After specific training of the physicians in the methods used, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of verapamil by comparing it with a reference drug: captopril. The main assessment criterion was the restoration of normal blood pressure in mildly to moderately hypertensive patients (blood pressure in excess of 160/95 mmHg). Blood pressure was evaluated by two methods: a mercury column sphygmomanometer, after the patient had rested in a half-sitting position for 10 minutes, and the ambulatory measurement of blood pressure (AMBP) using the SpaceLabs system. The results of this study involving 40 patients followed up for 3 months by 8 GPs in collaboration with our blood pressure unit were as follows: on verapamil, 47% of patients recovered normal values after 30 days of treatment and 71% after 60 days (with no change in dosage). On captopril, the normalization rates were 22 and 27% respectively. The highly significant reduction of blood pressure found by the "occasional" measurement for both treatments (p less than 0.001) was only faintly reflected by AMBP. Verapamil induced a reduction of nighttime blood pressure with no significant impact on heart rate. The clinical, paraclinical and electrocardiographic safety of both treatments was good.

摘要

轻至中度高血压的评估必须在通常开具治疗处方的条件下进行,即在全科医疗中。在医生接受了所使用方法的特定培训后,我们通过将维拉帕米的一种新剂型与对照药物卡托普利进行比较,评估了其疗效和安全性。主要评估标准是轻至中度高血压患者(血压超过160/95 mmHg)恢复正常血压。血压通过两种方法进行评估:在患者半卧位休息10分钟后,使用汞柱式血压计测量;以及使用太空实验室系统进行动态血压监测(AMBP)。这项由8名全科医生与我们的血压监测部门合作,对40名患者进行3个月随访的研究结果如下:服用维拉帕米的患者中,47%在治疗30天后恢复正常血压,60天后为71%(剂量未改变)。服用卡托普利的患者,血压正常化率分别为22%和27%。两种治疗方法通过“偶尔”测量发现的血压显著降低(p小于0.001)在动态血压监测中仅略有体现。维拉帕米可降低夜间血压,对心率无显著影响。两种治疗方法的临床、副临床和心电图安全性均良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验