Henn R Frank, Kang Lana, Tashjian Robert Z, Green Andrew
Department of Orthopaedics, The Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1913-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00358.
We are not aware of any previous studies of the relationship between patients' expectations regarding rotator cuff repair and the actual outcome. We hypothesized that preoperative expectations are predictive of the outcome of rotator cuff repair.
One hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent unilateral primary repair of a chronic rotator cuff tear were included in the study. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Each patient prospectively completed the Simple Shoulder Test (SST); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; three visual analogue scales for shoulder pain, shoulder function, and quality of life; and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) preoperatively and at one year (mean and standard deviation, 54.1 +/- 7.6 weeks) postoperatively. Preoperative expectations were quantified with use of six questions from the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS) questionnaire.
Greater preoperative expectations correlated with better postoperative performance on the SST, DASH, each visual analogue scale, and the SF-36 (p values ranging from <0.0001 to 0.03) as well as with greater improvement from the baseline scores on the DASH and SF-36 (p values ranging from <0.0001 to 0.018). A rigorous multivariate analysis controlling for age, gender, smoking, Workers' Compensation status, symptom duration, number of previous operations, number of comorbidities, tear size, and repair technique confirmed that greater expectations were a significant independent predictor of both better performance at one year and greater improvement on the SST, the DASH, each visual analogue scale, and the SF-36 (p values ranging from <0.001 to 0.042).
Patients' preoperative expectations regarding rotator cuff repair are associated with their actual self-assessed outcome. Variations in patient expectations may help to explain divergent results in published series as well as among various patient populations.
我们并不知晓此前有任何关于患者对肩袖修复的期望与实际治疗效果之间关系的研究。我们假设术前期望能够预测肩袖修复的结果。
本研究纳入了125例行单侧慢性肩袖撕裂初次修复术的患者。所有手术均由同一位外科医生完成。每位患者在术前及术后一年(平均时间和标准差为54.1±7.6周)前瞻性地完成简单肩部测试(SST)、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷、关于肩部疼痛、肩部功能及生活质量的三个视觉模拟量表,以及简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)。术前期望通过肌肉骨骼疾病结局数据评估与管理系统(MODEMS)问卷中的六个问题进行量化。
术前期望越高,术后在SST、DASH、各个视觉模拟量表及SF-36上的表现越好(p值范围为<0.0001至0.03),并且DASH和SF-36的基线分数改善也越大(p值范围为<0.0001至0.018)。一项严格的多变量分析,对年龄、性别、吸烟状况、工伤赔偿状态、症状持续时间、既往手术次数、合并症数量、撕裂大小及修复技术进行了控制,结果证实更高的期望是术后一年表现更好以及在SST、DASH、各个视觉模拟量表及SF-36上改善更大的显著独立预测因素(p值范围为<0.001至0.042)。
患者对肩袖修复的术前期望与其实际自我评估的结果相关。患者期望的差异可能有助于解释已发表系列研究以及不同患者群体之间结果的差异。