Henn R Frank, Tashjian Robert Z, Kang Lana, Green Andrew
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2105-13. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00260.
Previous studies have demonstrated varying correlations between Workers' Compensation status and the outcome of rotator cuff repair. However, none of those studies have formally accounted for potential confounding factors with multivariable analysis. We hypothesized that patients with Workers' Compensation claims who undergo rotator cuff repair have worse outcomes, even after controlling for confounding factors.
One hundred and twenty-five patients (including thirty-nine with Workers' Compensation claims) who underwent unilateral primary repair of a chronic rotator cuff tear by a single surgeon were studied prospectively and were evaluated one year postoperatively, prior to the settlement of any claims. Outcomes were assessed with the Simple Shoulder Test (SST); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) index; three visual analog scales (shoulder pain, shoulder function, and quality of life); and the Short Form-36 (SF-36).
Patients in the Workers' Compensation group were significantly younger, had greater work demands, and had lower marital rates, education levels, and preoperative expectations for the outcome of treatment as compared with those in the non-Workers' Compensation group (p = 0.001 to 0.016). Preoperatively, patients in the Workers' Compensation group had significantly lower scores on the SST, the SF-36 Physical Function scale, and the SF-36 Social Function scale (p = 0.01 to 0.038). One year postoperatively, those patients reported worse performance on the SST, the DASH, all three visual analog scales, and the SF-36 (p = 0.0007 to 0.05) and had worse improvement on the DASH, the visual analog scales for shoulder pain and function, and the SF-36 Bodily Pain and Role Emotional scales (p = 0.0028 to 0.038). Multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, smoking, marital status, education, duration of symptoms, work demands, expectations, and tear size confirmed that Workers' Compensation status was an independent predictor of worse DASH scores.
Patients with Workers' Compensation claims report worse outcomes, even after controlling for confounding factors. The present study provides further evidence that the existence of a Workers' Compensation claim portends a less robust outcome following rotator cuff repair.
Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
既往研究表明,工伤赔偿状况与肩袖修复的结果之间存在不同程度的相关性。然而,这些研究均未通过多变量分析正式考量潜在的混杂因素。我们推测,即使在控制混杂因素之后,接受肩袖修复的工伤赔偿患者的预后也较差。
对125例患者(包括39例有工伤赔偿申请的患者)进行前瞻性研究,这些患者均由同一位外科医生进行了慢性肩袖撕裂的单侧初次修复,并在术后一年、任何赔偿结算之前进行评估。采用简单肩部测试(SST)、手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)指数、三个视觉模拟量表(肩部疼痛、肩部功能和生活质量)以及简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)对结果进行评估。
与非工伤赔偿组患者相比,工伤赔偿组患者明显更年轻,工作要求更高,结婚率、教育水平和术前对治疗结果的期望更低(p = 0.001至0.016)。术前,工伤赔偿组患者在SST、SF-36身体功能量表和SF-36社会功能量表上的得分明显更低(p = 0.01至0.038)。术后一年,这些患者在SST、DASH、所有三个视觉模拟量表和SF-36上的表现更差(p = 0.0007至0.05),并且在DASH、肩部疼痛和功能的视觉模拟量表以及SF-36身体疼痛和角色情绪量表上的改善更差(p = 0.0028至0.038)。对年龄、性别、合并症、吸烟、婚姻状况、教育程度、症状持续时间、工作要求、期望和撕裂大小进行多变量分析后证实,工伤赔偿状况是DASH评分较差的独立预测因素。
即使在控制混杂因素之后,有工伤赔偿申请的患者报告的预后也较差。本研究进一步证明,存在工伤赔偿申请预示着肩袖修复后的预后较差。
预后I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。