Fonzi L, Gasparoni A, Capezzuoli L, Carboncini S, Belli M, Kaitsas V
Università degli Studi di Siena.
G Ital Endod. 1991;5(3):70-8.
The major goal of endodontic therapy has been achieved by condensing filling materials into the root canal. It is not uncommon to find excess material in the periapical tissue. It therefore becomes obligatory to use filling materials that have acceptable biocompatibility. The purpose of this investigation was to obtain a "toxicity profile" of some root canal materials and to compare our observations to study results found in literature. Gutta-percha and five endodontic filling cements were tested in vivo and in vitro. The in vivo biocompatibility involved the placement of the test material in 10 mm teflon tubes with an outer diameter of 1,3 mm which were then implanted subcutaneously into rats. The implants were left in situ for periods of 30 and 90 days. The hemolysis test was used for in vitro evaluations. The histological examination showed cellular responses of different intensity and extent. In some cases severe infiltration of inflammatory cells and areas with necrostis were observed. As a result, the root canal materials evaluated showed slight, moderate, and severe reactions, therefore, a different pattern in tissue response.
通过将充填材料加压注入根管,牙髓治疗的主要目标已达成。在根尖周组织中发现多余材料的情况并不少见。因此,使用具有可接受生物相容性的充填材料就变得势在必行。本研究的目的是获取一些根管材料的“毒性概况”,并将我们的观察结果与文献中的研究结果进行比较。对牙胶和五种牙髓充填粘固剂进行了体内和体外测试。体内生物相容性测试包括将测试材料放置在10毫米长、外径1.3毫米的特氟龙管中,然后将其皮下植入大鼠体内。植入物原位留存30天和90天。溶血试验用于体外评估。组织学检查显示了不同强度和程度的细胞反应。在某些情况下,观察到炎症细胞的严重浸润和坏死区域。结果,所评估的根管材料显示出轻微、中度和重度反应,因此,组织反应存在不同模式。