Science. 1984 Aug 31;225(4665):890-7. doi: 10.1126/science.225.4665.890.
A series of hypotheses is presented about the relation of national energy use to national economic activity (both time series and cross-sectional) which offer a different perspective from standard economics for the assessment of historical and current economic events. The analysis incorporates nearly 100 years of time series data and 3 years of cross-sectional data on 87 sectors of the United States economy. Gross national product, labor productivity, and price levels are all correlated closely with various aspects of energy use, and these correlations are improved when corrections are made for energy quality. A large portion of the apparent increase in U.S. energy efficiency has been due to our ability to expand the relative use of high-quality fuels such as petroleum and electricity, and also to relative shifts in fuel use between sectors of the economy. The concept of energy return on investment is introduced as a major driving force in our economy, and data are provided which show a marked decline in energy return on investment for all our principal fuels in recent decades. Future economic growth will depend largely on the net energy yield of alternative fuel sources, and some standard economic models may need to be modified to account for the biophysical constraints on human economic activity.
提出了一系列关于国家能源使用与国家经济活动(时间序列和横截面)之间关系的假设,这些假设为评估历史和当前经济事件提供了不同于标准经济学的视角。该分析纳入了近 100 年的时间序列数据和 3 年的美国经济 87 个部门的横截面数据。国民生产总值、劳动生产率和物价水平都与能源使用的各个方面密切相关,并且当对能源质量进行修正时,这些相关性会得到改善。美国能源效率的明显提高在很大程度上归因于我们扩大了石油和电力等优质燃料的相对使用能力,以及经济部门之间燃料使用的相对转移。投资能源回报的概念被引入作为我们经济的主要驱动力,并且提供的数据表明,我们所有主要燃料的投资能源回报在最近几十年都出现了明显下降。未来的经济增长将在很大程度上取决于替代燃料来源的净能源产量,一些标准经济模型可能需要进行修改,以考虑人类经济活动的生物物理限制。