Roff D A
Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 Jan;100(1):32-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801048. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
Three estimates of heritability are available from the half-sib pedigree design: the sire, dam and genotypic estimates. Because of its significantly smaller standard error, the genotypic estimate is preferred provided that there are no non-additive effects that inflate the estimate. I present two methods to test for such effects: these are a t-test of the paired sire and dam pseudovalues from the jackknife procedure and the likelihood ratio test from the animal model. Both methods are shown to be valid tests for significant dominance and/or maternal effects. SPLUS coding for the implementation of the jackknife method is provided. Unless sample sizes are very large, the power of the tests is low and hence caution is advised in the use of the genotypic estimate following a nonsignificant test. An approximate power analysis can be done using the data from the jackknife method but the estimated power is typically a substantial underestimate of the true power and its use is not recommended.
父系、母系和基因型估计值。由于基因型估计值的标准误差显著更小,因此在不存在使估计值膨胀的非加性效应的情况下,基因型估计值更受青睐。我提出了两种检验此类效应的方法:一种是对来自刀切法的成对父系和母系伪值进行t检验,另一种是动物模型的似然比检验。两种方法均被证明是检验显著显性和/或母体效应的有效方法。提供了用于实施刀切法的SPLUS编码。除非样本量非常大,否则检验的功效较低,因此在非显著检验后使用基因型估计值时建议谨慎。可以使用来自刀切法的数据进行近似功效分析,但估计的功效通常会大大低估真实功效,因此不建议使用。