Riedel K, Kremer T, Hoffmann H, Pfannschmidt J, Reimer P, Dienemann H, Germann G, Sauerbier M
Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie-Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, BG-Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen.
Chirurg. 2008 Feb;79(2):164-74. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1382-9.
In defect reconstruction following radical oncologic resection of malignant chest wall tumors, adequate soft-tissue reconstruction must be achieved along with function, stability, integrity, and aesthetics of the chest wall. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the oncoplastic concept following radical resection of malignant chest wall infiltration with an interdisciplinary approach. Between 1999 and 2005, 36 consecutive patients (nine males, 27 females, mean age 55 years, range 20-78) were treated with resection for malignant tumors of the chest wall. Indications were locally recurrent breast carcinoma (patient n=22), thymoma (n=1), and desmoid tumor (n=1). Primary lesions of the chest wall were spinalioma (n=1), sarcoma (n=7), and non-small-cell lung cancer (n=2). There were distant metastases of colon and cervical cancer in one patient each. Soft-tissue reconstruction was carried out using primary closure (n=1), external oblique flap (n=1), pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (n=3), latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (n=18), vertical or transversal rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n=9), free tensor fascia lata- flap (n=6), trapezius flap (n=1), serratus flap (n=1), and one filet flap. In 15 reconstructive procedures microvascular techniques were used. An average of 3.4 ribs were resected. Stability of the chest wall was obtained with synthetic meshes. The latissimus dorsi flap is considered the flap of choice in chest wall reconstruction. However, alternatives such as pectoralis major flap, VRAM/TRAM flap, free TFL flap, and serratus flap must also be considered. Low mortality and morbidity rates allow tumor resection and chest wall reconstruction even in a palliative setting.
在恶性胸壁肿瘤根治性肿瘤切除后的缺损重建中,必须实现胸壁的功能、稳定性、完整性和美观性的充分软组织重建。本回顾性分析的目的是采用多学科方法评估恶性胸壁浸润根治性切除后的肿瘤整形概念。1999年至2005年期间,连续36例患者(9例男性,27例女性,平均年龄55岁,范围20 - 78岁)接受了胸壁恶性肿瘤切除术。适应证为局部复发性乳腺癌(患者n = 22)、胸腺瘤(n = 1)和硬纤维瘤(n = 1)。胸壁原发性病变为脊膜瘤(n = 1)、肉瘤(n = 7)和非小细胞肺癌(n = 2)。各有1例患者发生结肠癌和宫颈癌远处转移。采用一期缝合(n = 1)、腹外斜肌皮瓣(n = 1)、胸大肌肌皮瓣(n = 3)、背阔肌肌皮瓣(n = 18)、腹直肌垂直或横行肌皮瓣(n = 9)、游离阔筋膜张肌皮瓣(n = 6)、斜方肌皮瓣(n = 1)、前锯肌皮瓣(n = 1)和1例鱼片皮瓣进行软组织重建。15例重建手术采用了微血管技术。平均切除3.4根肋骨。采用合成网片获得胸壁稳定性。背阔肌皮瓣被认为是胸壁重建的首选皮瓣。然而,也必须考虑胸大肌皮瓣、腹直肌垂直或横行肌皮瓣、游离阔筋膜张肌皮瓣和前锯肌皮瓣等替代方案。即使在姑息治疗情况下,低死亡率和发病率也允许进行肿瘤切除和胸壁重建。