Suppr超能文献

尿路结石:静脉肾盂造影术与CT肾结石检查?一个严格评价的主题。

Urinary calculus: IVU vs. CT renal stone? A critically appraised topic.

作者信息

Shine Suzanne

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):41-3. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9307-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We wondered whether noncontrast CT performs better than the intravenous urogram (IVU) in the detection of urinary calculi.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was undertaken in order to answer the above question. Both primary and secondary sources of evidence were searched. The retrieved evidence was then appraised.

RESULTS

The strongest evidence was in a meta-analysis by Worster and colleagues (level 1a evidence according to the Oxford/CEBM levels of evidence). This was an analysis of four studies with a total of 296 patients who underwent intravenous urogram and noncontrast CT. This study shows that CT has better diagnostic performance than IVU for the detection of urinary stones.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature suggests that CT should be utilized in preference to IVU for patients with suspected urolithiasis.

摘要

背景

我们想知道在检测尿路结石方面,非增强CT是否比静脉肾盂造影(IVU)表现更好。

方法

为回答上述问题,我们对文献进行了全面检索。同时检索了主要和次要证据来源。然后对检索到的证据进行评估。

结果

最有力的证据来自Worster及其同事的一项荟萃分析(根据牛津/循证医学中心的证据水平为1a级证据)。这是对四项研究的分析,共有296例患者接受了静脉肾盂造影和非增强CT检查。这项研究表明,在检测尿路结石方面,CT比IVU具有更好的诊断性能。

结论

文献表明,对于疑似尿路结石的患者,应优先使用CT而非IVU。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验