Kollmar O, Moussavian M R, Bolli M, Richter S, Schilling M K
Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University of Saarland, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1699-703. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0258-0. Epub 2007 Sep 2.
Leakage of pancreatojejunostomies after pancreatic resections remains a challenge even at high volume centers. We here utilized a simple pancreas anatomy classification to study the effect of pancreatic anatomy on the development of pancreatic fistula after pancreas resection and pancreatojejunostomies. Also, the effect of surgical experience on the development of pancreatic fistulas was studied. Three hundred ninety-one patients undergoing pancreatic resections and reconstruction with a pancreatojejunostomy were studied. Closed suction drain was placed behind the anastomosis, and drainage fluid was collected postoperatively. A twofold increase over the serum amylase level was considered a fistula and was classified as described by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. In 67 patients, the structural quality of the pancreatic parenchyma and the diameter of the pancreatic duct were classified as being <2 mm (2 points), between 2 and 5 mm (1 point), or >5 mm (0 points). The pancreatic parenchyma was assessed as being soft (2 points), intermediate (1 point), or hard (0 points). Pancreatic leakage as a function of surgeons' experience was also studied. Leakage was found in 25.1%, 8.9% being of type A, 10.2% being of type B, and 5.9% of type C. Pancreatic fistulas were only observed in patients with a score of 2 points or more. Age over 70 years, operations >6 h, and extended lymphadenectomy or surgeons experience were not associated with a higher leakage rate. In this study, leakage after pancreatojejunostomy was only associated with pancreatic anatomy, classified with a simple score. That score might improve comparability of studies on pancreatic leakage. Furthermore, drainage of pancreatic anastomosis might safely be omitted in patients with a low risk score for leakage.
即使在高容量中心,胰腺切除术后胰肠吻合口漏仍是一个挑战。我们在此利用一种简单的胰腺解剖分类方法,研究胰腺解剖结构对胰腺切除及胰肠吻合术后胰瘘发生的影响。此外,还研究了手术经验对胰瘘发生的影响。对391例行胰腺切除并胰肠吻合重建术的患者进行了研究。在吻合口后方放置闭式吸引引流管,术后收集引流液。血清淀粉酶水平升高两倍以上被认为是胰瘘,并按照国际胰瘘定义研究组的描述进行分类。在67例患者中,胰腺实质的结构质量和胰管直径被分类为<2 mm(2分)、2至5 mm(1分)或>5 mm(0分)。胰腺实质被评估为软(2分)、中等(1分)或硬(0分)。还研究了胰瘘与外科医生经验的关系。发现胰瘘发生率为25.1%,其中A型为8.9%,B型为10.2%,C型为5.9%。仅在评分为2分及以上的患者中观察到胰瘘。70岁以上、手术时间>6小时、扩大淋巴结清扫术或外科医生经验与较高的胰瘘发生率无关。在本研究中,胰肠吻合术后的胰瘘仅与胰腺解剖结构有关,通过简单评分进行分类。该评分可能会提高胰瘘研究的可比性。此外,对于胰瘘风险评分低的患者,可能可以安全地省略胰腺吻合口的引流。