Roffey Darren M, Byrne Nuala M, Hills Andrew P
School of Human Movement Studies and ATN Centre for Metabolic Fitness, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
J Sports Sci. 2007 Oct;25(12):1325-35. doi: 10.1080/02640410601175428.
In this study, we examined the effect of stage duration on physiological variables commonly used to determine maximum aerobic performance during cycle ergometry. Ten recreationally trained males (mean age 27.8 +/- 7.1 years; BMI 24.3 +/- 2.5 kg x m(-2); VO2max 52.5 +/- 5.9 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) performed three different stage duration protocols on two separate occasions. Each short stage (SS; 1-min stages), long stage (LS; 3-min stages), and constant load + short stage (CL + SS; 4-min constant load followed by 1-min stages) protocol started at 50 W with increments of 30 W. The physiological variables measured included: time to maximum, maximum workload, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max), maximum heart rate, maximum rating of perceived exertion, maximum blood lactate concentration, and maximum respiratory exchange ratio. The ventilatory threshold was calculated for every trial of the three protocols. There was no difference in VO2max, but maximum heart rate was higher in the LS protocol (P<0.05). Maximum respiratory exchange ratio varied between the protocols (P<0.05), while maximum workload differed between the SS and LS protocols, and the LS and CL + SS protocols (P<0.0001). The physiological variables were comparable between trials for the SS and CL + SS protocols, but maximum workload and VO2max differed for the LS protocol (P<0.05). Workload at the ventilatory threshold was lower for the LS protocol (P<0.05). Heart rate at the ventilatory threshold was different between the LS and CL + SS protocols (P<0.05). Performing a test involving 1- or 3-min stage durations on a single occasion was appropriate for the determination of VO2max and the ventilatory threshold. However, the disparity in heart rate and workload could result in differences in mechanical and physiological work being undertaken. Consistent use of a protocol may alleviate errors during exercise prescription.
在本研究中,我们考察了阶段持续时间对常用于确定自行车测力计运动中最大有氧能力的生理变量的影响。十名经过休闲训练的男性(平均年龄27.8±7.1岁;体重指数24.3±2.5 kg·m⁻²;最大摄氧量52.5±5.9 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)在两个不同场合进行了三种不同阶段持续时间的方案。每个短阶段(SS;1分钟阶段)、长阶段(LS;3分钟阶段)和恒定负荷+短阶段(CL+SS;4分钟恒定负荷后接1分钟阶段)方案均从50 W开始,每次增加30 W。测量的生理变量包括:达到最大值的时间、最大工作量、最大耗氧量(最大摄氧量)、最大心率、最大主观用力程度评分、最大血乳酸浓度和最大呼吸交换率。对三种方案的每次试验都计算了通气阈值。最大摄氧量没有差异,但LS方案中的最大心率更高(P<0.05)。最大呼吸交换率在各方案之间有所不同(P<0.05),而最大工作量在SS和LS方案之间以及LS和CL+SS方案之间存在差异(P<0.0001)。SS和CL+SS方案试验之间的生理变量具有可比性,但LS方案的最大工作量和最大摄氧量有所不同(P<0.05)。LS方案通气阈值时的工作量较低(P<0.05)。LS和CL+SS方案通气阈值时的心率不同(P<0.05)。单次进行涉及1分钟或3分钟阶段持续时间的测试适用于确定最大摄氧量和通气阈值。然而,心率和工作量的差异可能导致所进行的机械和生理功存在差异。在运动处方中持续使用一种方案可能会减少误差。