Okrasinski E B, Pardo A D, Graehler R A
Department of Urban Practice, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901-1071.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Dec 1;199(11):1590-3.
Acrylic external skeletal fixators (ESF) were compared with Kirschner ESF in biomechanical tests. A 2-cm unilateral acrylic ESF was found to be superior to medium Kirschner ESF in compression and shear loads. Acrylic ESF performed as well as Kirschner ESF in torsion loads. Acrylic ESF were used on 11 dogs and cats for repair of long bone fractures, for arthrodesis, or for immobilization of joints following ligament or tendon surgery. There were no complications associated with the use of acrylic ESF. Acrylic ESF offers the advantage of reduced cost, improved versatility, and simplified application technique when compared with Kirschner ESF.
在生物力学测试中，对丙烯酸类外骨骼固定器（ESF）和克氏针外骨骼固定器进行了比较。结果发现，一个2厘米长的单侧丙烯酸类ESF在压缩和剪切载荷方面优于中型克氏针外骨骼固定器。丙烯酸类ESF在扭转载荷方面的表现与克氏针外骨骼固定器相当。11只犬猫使用丙烯酸类ESF修复长骨骨折、进行关节固定术或在韧带或肌腱手术后固定关节。使用丙烯酸类ESF未出现并发症。与克氏针外骨骼固定器相比，丙烯酸类ESF具有成本降低、通用性提高和应用技术简化的优点。
