Burleson Aaron, Nusstein John, Reader Al, Beck Mike
Department of Endodontics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43218-2357, USA.
J Endod. 2007 Jul;33(7):782-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.04.015.
This in vivo, prospective, randomized, single-blinded study histologically compared biofilm/necrotic debridement efficiency of a hand/rotary technique versus a hand/rotary/1 min ultrasound technique in the mesial roots of necrotic, human mandibular molars. The hand/rotary group consisted of 20 mesial roots. The hand/rotary/ultrasound group consisted of 20 mesial roots prepared with the same hand/rotary technique followed by 1 min of ultrasonic irrigation, per canal, utilizing an ultrasonic needle in a MiniEndo unit. Following extraction, histologic preparation and staining, 0.2 mum cross-sections from the 1- to 3-mm apical levels were evaluated for percentage of biofilm/necrotic debris removal. Cleanliness results at the 1-, 2- and 3-mm levels for the hand/rotary and hand/rotary/ultrasound techniques, respectively, were: Canals, 80% versus 95%, 92% versus 99%, and 95% versus 100%; Isthmuses, 33% versus 83%, 31% versus 86%, 45% versus 91%. Statistical analysis revealed mean percent canal and isthmus cleanliness values to be significantly higher for hand/rotary/ultrasound technique at all levels evaluated.
这项体内前瞻性随机单盲研究,从组织学角度比较了手部/旋转技术与手部/旋转/1分钟超声技术在坏死的人类下颌磨牙近中根处清除生物膜/坏死组织的效率。手部/旋转组包括20个近中根。手部/旋转/超声组包括20个近中根,先用相同的手部/旋转技术进行预备,然后每根管使用MiniEndo超声治疗仪的超声针进行1分钟的超声冲洗。拔牙后,经过组织学制备和染色,对根尖1至3毫米水平的0.2微米横截面进行评估,以确定生物膜/坏死碎片的清除百分比。手部/旋转技术和手部/旋转/超声技术在1毫米、2毫米和3毫米水平的清洁结果分别为:根管,80%对95%、92%对99%、95%对100%;峡部,33%对83%、31%对86%、45%对91%。统计分析显示,在所有评估水平上,手部/旋转/超声技术的根管和峡部平均清洁百分比值均显著更高。