Tammela T L, Leinonen A S, Kontturi M J
Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Finland.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1991;25(4):283-6. doi: 10.3109/00365599109024561.
The diagnostic significance of excretory urography, renal angiography, ultrasound and computed tomography for predicting the stage of tumours was evaluated by comparing their results with peroperative and histopathological findings. Thirty-nine out of 178 patients operated on for renal cell carcinoma from 1981 to 1988 were subjected to all four diagnostic procedures. The T stage was determined correctly by computed tomography in 80% of the cases, by ultrasound in 74.5%, by renal angiography in 64% and by excretory urography in 56.5%. Excretory urography did not give any significant additional information on the T category compared with the other imaging methods. Angiography is still of value in that it gives preoperative information on the collateral circulation and the number of renal arteries and their location.
通过将排泄性尿路造影、肾血管造影、超声及计算机断层扫描的结果与手术中和组织病理学检查结果进行比较,评估了这些检查方法对预测肿瘤分期的诊断意义。1981年至1988年期间,178例接受肾细胞癌手术的患者中有39例接受了所有这四种诊断检查。计算机断层扫描在80%的病例中正确确定了T分期,超声为74.5%,肾血管造影为64%,排泄性尿路造影为56.5%。与其他成像方法相比,排泄性尿路造影在T分类方面未提供任何显著的额外信息。血管造影仍有价值,因为它能提供术前关于侧支循环、肾动脉数量及其位置的信息。