• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表面处理对Dicor努氏硬度的影响。

The effect of surface treatment on the Knoop hardness of Dicor.

作者信息

Naylor W P, Munoz C A, Goodacre C J, Swartz M L, Moore B K

机构信息

USAF Dental Investigation Service.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1991 Mar-Apr;4(2):147-51.

PMID:1781876
Abstract

One advantage cited for the use of Dicor over other ceramic materials is a reported Knoop hardness comparable to human enamel. However, when fabricating dental restorations, a Dicor glass-ceramic casting generally is subjected to several different surface treatments because of processing, esthetic, and functional requirements. Therefore, this study compared the Knoop hardness of Dicor specimens under three conditions: (1) cerammed, (2) cerammed and shaded, and (3) sectioned to reveal internal material. Knoop hardness differences between groups were significant (P less than or equal to .05). The cerammed surface was the hardest; it was harder than human enamel. Shaded specimens had a surface hardness comparable to dental porcelain. However, the internal glass-ceramic material, located beneath the shading porcelain and cerammed surface, had a Knoop hardness slightly higher than that of human enamel.

摘要

使用Dicor相对于其他陶瓷材料的一个优势是,据报道其努氏硬度与人类牙釉质相当。然而,在制作牙科修复体时,由于加工、美学和功能要求,Dicor微晶玻璃铸件通常要经过几种不同的表面处理。因此,本研究比较了Dicor试样在三种条件下的努氏硬度:(1)烧结;(2)烧结并着色;(3)切片以显示内部材料。各组之间的努氏硬度差异显著(P≤0.05)。烧结表面最硬;它比人类牙釉质更硬。着色试样的表面硬度与牙科陶瓷相当。然而,位于着色瓷层和烧结表面下方的内部微晶玻璃材料的努氏硬度略高于人类牙釉质。

相似文献

1
The effect of surface treatment on the Knoop hardness of Dicor.表面处理对Dicor努氏硬度的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1991 Mar-Apr;4(2):147-51.
2
Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro.
J Dent Res. 1991 Mar;70(3):221-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345910700031301.
3
The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.氢氟酸表面处理对氧化锆贴面陶瓷的影响及粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X.
4
Influence of surface preparation on the strength and surface microstructure of a cast dental ceramic.表面处理对铸造牙科陶瓷强度和表面微观结构的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1989 Sep-Oct;2(5):459-66.
5
Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay.通过陶瓷嵌体固化的新型树脂水门汀的硬化
Oper Dent. 1999 Jan-Feb;24(1):38-44.
6
Effects of ion exchange on hardness and fracture toughness of dental ceramics.离子交换对牙科陶瓷硬度和断裂韧性的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Jul-Aug;5(4):309-14.
7
Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.Dicor玻璃陶瓷牙修复体16年的存留情况。第三部分:粘结剂以及牙齿或牙齿替代核心结构的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86(5):511-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.119415.
8
Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics.釉面和抛光表面处理对两种低熔陶瓷摩擦系数的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Mar;93(3):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.010.
9
The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.陶瓷表面处理对复合树脂与全瓷冠修复材料之间拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.012.
10
Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
Quintessence Int. 1994 Mar;25(3):199-207.