Masi Gabriele, Perugi Giulio, Millepiedi Stefania, Toni Cristina, Mucci Maria, Pfanner Chiara, Berloffa Stefano, Pari Cinzia, Akiskal Hagop S
IRCCS Stella Maris, Scientific Institute Child Neurology and Psychiatry, 56018 Calambrone, Pisa, Italy.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;17(4):475-86. doi: 10.1089/cap.2006.0107.
This paper reports on implications of bipolar disorder (BD) co-morbidity in 120 children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (84 males, 36 females, age 13.7 +/- 2.8 years), diagnosed using a clinical interview according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria, and naturalistically followed-up for 12 +/- 6 months. The aim of this naturalistic, retrospective study was to explore the effect of BD co-morbidity, disentangling it from other co-occurring variables, namely the co-morbidity with disruptive behavior disorders. Forty three patients (35.8%) had a bipolar co-morbidity. Compared with OCD patients without BD, they had an earlier onset of OCD, a greater severity and functional impairment, more frequent hoarding obsessions and compulsions, and a poorer response to treatments. They had a higher co-morbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional-defiant disorder (ODD), and a lower co-morbidity with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Finally, they received more mood stabilizers, and 30.2% of them did not receive serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) because of pharmacological (hypo)mania. When all the OCD responders and nonresponders were compared, nonresponders (n = 42, 35%) were more severe at baseline and at end of the follow-up, had more frequently hoarding obsessions and compulsions, and had more frequent BD, ODD, and conduct disorder (CD) and less GAD and panic disorder. In the final regression model, hoarding obsessions and compulsions, co-morbidity with ODD, and CD were negative predictors of treatment outcome. This study suggests that even though bipolar co-morbidity is frequent and affects phenomenology and co-morbidity in pediatric OCD, its effect on treatment response seems prevalently accounted for by co-morbidity with disruptive behavior disorders. The significance of the hoarding subtype deserves further research on larger samples of pediatric patients.
本文报告了120例患有强迫症(OCD)的儿童和青少年(84名男性,36名女性,年龄13.7±2.8岁)中双相情感障碍(BD)共病的影响。这些患者根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第4版(DSM-IV)标准通过临床访谈进行诊断,并进行了为期12±6个月的自然随访。这项自然主义的回顾性研究的目的是探讨BD共病的影响,并将其与其他同时出现的变量区分开来,即与破坏性行为障碍的共病。43例患者(35.8%)患有双相共病。与没有BD的OCD患者相比,他们的OCD发病更早,病情更严重且功能损害更大,囤积强迫观念和强迫行为更频繁,对治疗的反应更差。他们与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和对立违抗障碍(ODD)的共病率更高,与广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的共病率更低。最后,他们服用了更多的心境稳定剂,其中30.2%的患者由于药物性(轻)躁狂而未接受5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)治疗。当比较所有OCD应答者和无应答者时,无应答者(n = 42,35%)在基线和随访结束时病情更严重,囤积强迫观念和强迫行为更频繁,BD、ODD和品行障碍(CD)更常见,而GAD和惊恐障碍更少。在最终的回归模型中,囤积强迫观念和强迫行为、与ODD的共病以及CD是治疗结果的负性预测因素。这项研究表明,尽管双相共病在儿童OCD中很常见,并影响其现象学和共病情况,但其对治疗反应的影响似乎主要由与破坏性行为障碍的共病所导致。囤积亚型的重要性值得在更大样本的儿科患者中进一步研究。