Hegde Asmita, Amaria Tenaz, Mandke Alka, Mandke N V
Lilavati Hospital and Research Cenre, Bandra Reclamation, Mumbai, India.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2005 Jan;8(1):49-54.
We compared the effects of continuous intravenous infusions of nicorandil and diltiazem on left ventricular function, haemodynamics and as anti-ischaemic and anti-arrhythmic agents in 50 patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass surgery using arterial conduits. The patients were randomized into two equal groups to receive diltiazem or nicorandil. Both the drugs were given as a continuous infusion in the dose of 1 microg/kg/min starting at induction and continued for 24 hours postoperatively. Haemodynamic parameters, cardiac enzyme levels and use of vasoactive agents were studied and compared using ANOVA, unpaired "t" and Fisher's exact tests. The two groups did not differ with respect to preoperative and operative data. Diltiazem group showed lower cardiac index (2.66+/-0.8 and 2.27+/-0.89 L/min/m2) as compared with nicorandil group (3.16+/-0.79 and 2.97+/-1.01 L/min/m2) during revascularisation of anterior (P=0.03) and inferior (P=0.01) circulation respectively. The systemic vascular resistance index was higher (2290+/-699 and 2545+/-911 dyne.sec.cm(-5).m2) in diltiazem group as compared with nicorandil group (1822+/-532 and 1877+/-548 dyne. sec.cm(-5).m2) during revascularization of anterior (P=0.01) and inferior (P=0.002) circulation respectively. The mean pulmonary artery pressure was significantly higher in nicorandil group as compared with diltiazem group during revascularisation of anterior circulation (22.5+/-4.9 and 18.1+/-6.8 mmHg, P=0.01). The patients in the diltiazem group maintained a lower heart rate throughout the study period, but the difference was not statistically significant. None of the patients exhibited any arrhythmia except one in nicorandil group, who developed supraventricular arrhythmia 24 hours postoperatively. Cardiac enzyme levels were found to be similar in the two groups. The present study demonstrates that the anti-ischemic and antiarrythmic effects of diltiazem and nicorandil are comparable, but diltiazem causes a decrease in cardiac index and increase in systemic vascular resistance index during revascularization of anterior and inferior circulation.
我们比较了持续静脉输注尼可地尔和地尔硫䓬对50例使用动脉血管进行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术患者左心室功能、血流动力学的影响,以及它们作为抗缺血和抗心律失常药物的作用。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受地尔硫䓬或尼可地尔治疗。两种药物均以1微克/千克/分钟的剂量从诱导期开始持续静脉输注,并在术后持续24小时。使用方差分析、非配对“t”检验和Fisher精确检验对血流动力学参数、心肌酶水平和血管活性药物的使用情况进行研究和比较。两组患者的术前和手术数据无差异。在前循环(P = 0.03)和下循环(P = 0.01)血管重建期间,地尔硫䓬组的心脏指数(分别为2.66±0.8和2.27±0.89升/分钟/平方米)低于尼可地尔组(分别为3.16±0.79和2.97±1.01升/分钟/平方米)。在前循环(P = 0.01)和下循环(P = 0.002)血管重建期间,地尔硫䓬组的全身血管阻力指数(分别为2290±699和2545±911达因·秒·厘米⁻⁵·平方米)高于尼可地尔组(分别为1822±532和1877±548达因·秒·厘米⁻⁵·平方米)。在前循环血管重建期间,尼可地尔组的平均肺动脉压显著高于地尔硫䓬组(分别为22.5±4.9和18.1±6.8毫米汞柱,P = 0.01)。地尔硫䓬组患者在整个研究期间心率维持较低水平,但差异无统计学意义。除尼可地尔组有1例患者术后24小时发生室上性心律失常外,两组患者均未出现任何心律失常。两组患者的心肌酶水平相似。本研究表明,地尔硫䓬和尼可地尔的抗缺血和抗心律失常作用相当,但地尔硫䓬在前循环和下循环血管重建期间会导致心脏指数下降和全身血管阻力指数升高。