• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待意味着什么?对比管理科学与经济学视角下的急诊等待问题。

What's in a wait? Contrasting management science and economic perspectives on waiting for emergency care.

作者信息

Morton Alec, Bevan Gwyn

机构信息

Operational Research Group, Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London , United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2008 Feb;85(2):207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.014
PMID:17825940
Abstract

The current paper reviews and contrasts a management science view of waiting for healthcare, which centres on queues as devices for buffering demand, with an economic view, which stresses the role of the incentive structure, in the context of English Accident and Emergency Departments. We demonstrate that the management science view provides insight into waiting time performance within a single facility but is limited in its ability to shed light on variations in performance across facilities. We argue, with reference to supporting data, that such variations may be explainable by a proper understanding of the incentive structure in A&E Departments.

摘要

本文回顾并对比了在英国急诊部门背景下,关于等待医疗服务的管理科学观点与经济学观点。管理科学观点以队列作为缓冲需求的手段为核心,而经济学观点则强调激励结构的作用。我们证明,管理科学观点有助于深入了解单个机构内的等待时间表现,但在解释不同机构间表现差异方面能力有限。我们结合支持数据表明,通过恰当理解急诊部门的激励结构,这种差异或许可以得到解释。

相似文献

1
What's in a wait? Contrasting management science and economic perspectives on waiting for emergency care.等待意味着什么?对比管理科学与经济学视角下的急诊等待问题。
Health Policy. 2008 Feb;85(2):207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
2
Should we scrap the target of a maximum four hour wait in emergency departments?我们应该放弃急诊部门最长等待四小时的目标吗?
BMJ. 2017 Oct 25;359:j4857. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4857.
3
Waiting for the waiting to end.等待着等待的结束。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2012 Oct;37(10):113-7.
4
Why Wait? EMS managers can proactively reduce ED delays.为何要等待?急救医疗服务管理人员可以主动减少急诊科的延误情况。
JEMS. 2011 Jan;36(1):24. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2510(11)70010-9.
5
Clean beds, less-crowded. State-of-the-art bed tracking leads to shorter ED wait and faster turn-arounds.床位清洁,空间不拥挤。先进的床位追踪系统可缩短急诊等待时间并加快周转速度。
Health Manag Technol. 2008 Jul;29(7):26-7, 37.
6
Efficiency in emergency departments: is the wait over?急诊科的效率:等待结束了吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;47(3):294; author reply 295. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.035.
7
Hospital crowding and ED delays: a case study.医院拥挤与急诊科延误:一项案例研究。
Trustee. 2005 Jul-Aug;58(7):30-1, 1.
8
Tracking system helps ED slash wait times, staff costs.追踪系统有助于急诊科大幅缩短等待时间并降低员工成本。
Data Strateg Benchmarks. 1998 Aug;2(8):113-6.
9
Long waits in NHS casualty departments.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)急诊部门的长时间等待。
CMAJ. 2002 Aug 6;167(3):292.
10
Next steps in monitoring care: clinical quality indicators.监测护理的后续步骤:临床质量指标。
Emerg Nurse. 2011 Feb;18(9):6-7. doi: 10.7748/en.18.9.6.s8.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Dynamic Flow of Emergency Department (ED) Patient Managements: A Multistate Model Approach.量化急诊科患者管理的动态流程:一种多状态模型方法。
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Dec 3;2020:2059379. doi: 10.1155/2020/2059379. eCollection 2020.
2
Why are there long waits at English emergency departments?为什么英国的急诊部门要排长队?
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01121-7. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
National targets, process transformation and local consequences in an NHS emergency department (ED): a qualitative study.
国家目标、流程转型与英国国家医疗服务体系急诊部的地方后果:一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 13;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-14-12.
4
Hospital determinants of emergency department left without being seen rates.急诊未就诊率的医院决定因素。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):24-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 21.