Mänty Minna, Heinonen Ari, Leinonen Raija, Törmäkangas Timo, Sakari-Rantala Ritva, Hirvensalo Mirja, von Bonsdorff Mikaela B, Rantanen Taina
Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Gerontology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;88(9):1108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.016.
To validate self-reported preclinical mobility limitation concept and self-report assessment method against muscle power and walking speed, and to study the predictive validity of preclinical mobility limitation with respect to future risk of manifest mobility limitation.
Observational prospective cohort study and cross-sectional analysis.
Research laboratory and community.
A total of 632 community-living (age range, 75-81 y) women and men took part in the baseline assessments and 302 persons in the semi-annual interviews on mobility limitation over 2 years.
Not applicable.
Walking speed, muscle power, and self-reported preclinical and manifest mobility limitation. Preclinical mobility limitation was defined as self-reported tiredness or modification of task performance without task difficulty. At baseline, 4 subgroups were created according to self-reported preclinical mobility limitation in any of 3 mobility tasks (walking 2 km, walking 0.5 km, climbing up stairs): no limitation, preclinical limitation, and minor and major manifest limitation.
At baseline, participants with preclinical mobility limitation showed intermediate levels of walking speed and muscle power, compared with those with no limitation or manifest mobility limitation. Participants reporting baseline preclinical mobility limitation had 3- to 6-fold higher age- and sex-adjusted risk of progressing to major manifest mobility limitation during the 2-year follow-up compared with participants with no limitation at baseline, whereas the risk among those with minor limitation at baseline was 14- to 18-fold higher compared with those with no limitation.
The self-report assessment tool proved to be a valid measure to capture the early signs of disability and may serve as an inexpensive tool for identifying those nondisabled persons at high risk for future disability.
对照肌肉力量和步行速度验证自我报告的临床前活动受限概念及自我报告评估方法,并研究临床前活动受限对未来出现明显活动受限风险的预测效度。
观察性前瞻性队列研究及横断面分析。
研究实验室及社区。
共有632名社区居住的(年龄范围75 - 81岁)男性和女性参与了基线评估,302人参与了为期2年的关于活动受限的半年一次访谈。
不适用。
步行速度、肌肉力量以及自我报告的临床前和明显活动受限情况。临床前活动受限定义为自我报告的疲劳或任务执行方式改变但无任务难度。在基线时,根据在3项活动任务(步行2千米、步行0.5千米、爬楼梯)中任何一项的自我报告临床前活动受限情况创建了4个亚组:无受限、临床前受限以及轻度和重度明显受限。
在基线时,与无受限或明显活动受限的参与者相比,有临床前活动受限的参与者步行速度和肌肉力量处于中等水平。报告基线临床前活动受限的参与者在2年随访期间进展为重度明显活动受限的年龄和性别调整风险比基线时无受限的参与者高3至6倍,而基线时轻度受限者的风险比无受限者高14至18倍。
自我报告评估工具被证明是捕捉残疾早期迹象的有效措施,可作为识别未来有残疾高风险的非残疾人士的廉价工具。