Harikumar Kaleeckal G, Lam Polo C-H, Dong Maoqing, Sexton Patrick M, Abagyan Ruben, Miller Laurence J
Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 9;282(45):32834-43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704563200. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
Full structural characterization of G protein-coupled receptors has been limited to rhodopsin, with its uniquely stable structure and ability to be crystallized. For other members of this important superfamily, direct structural insights have been limited to NMR structures of soluble domains. Two members of the Class II family have recently had the structures of their isolated amino-terminal regions solved by NMR, yet it remains unclear how that domain is aligned with the heptahelical transmembrane bundle domain of those receptors. Indeed, three distinct orientations have been suggested for different members of this family. In the current work, we have utilized fluorescence resonance energy transfer to establish the distances between four residues distributed throughout fully biologically active, high affinity analogues of secretin and distinct residues in each of four extracellular regions of the intact secretin receptor. These 16 distance constraints were utilized along with nine photoaffinity labeling spatial approximation constraints to study the three proposed orientations of the peptide-binding amino terminus and helical bundle domains of this receptor. In the best model, the carboxyl terminus of secretin was found to bind in a groove above the beta-hairpin region of the receptor amino terminus, with its amino-terminal end adjacent to the third extracellular loop and top of transmembrane segment VI. This refined model of the intact receptor was also fully consistent with the spatial approximation of the Trp(48)-Asp(49)-Asn(50) endogenous agonist segment with the third extracellular loop region that it has been shown to photolabel. This provides strong evidence for the orientation of peptide-binding and signaling domains of a prototypic Class II G protein-coupled receptor.
G蛋白偶联受体的完整结构表征仅限于视紫红质,因其具有独特的稳定结构和可结晶的能力。对于这个重要超家族的其他成员,直接的结构见解仅限于可溶性结构域的核磁共振结构。II类家族的两个成员最近通过核磁共振解析了其分离的氨基末端区域的结构,但该结构域与这些受体的七螺旋跨膜束结构域如何排列仍不清楚。事实上,该家族的不同成员已被提出三种不同的取向。在当前的工作中,我们利用荧光共振能量转移来确定在完全具有生物活性的高亲和力促胰液素类似物中分布的四个残基与完整促胰液素受体的四个细胞外区域中每个区域的不同残基之间的距离。利用这16个距离约束以及9个光亲和标记空间近似约束来研究该受体肽结合氨基末端和螺旋束结构域的三种 proposed 取向。在最佳模型中,发现促胰液素的羧基末端结合在受体氨基末端β-发夹区域上方的凹槽中,其氨基末端与第三个细胞外环和跨膜片段VI的顶部相邻。完整受体的这种精细模型也与已显示光标记的Trp(48)-Asp(49)-Asn(50)内源性激动剂片段与第三个细胞外环区域的空间近似完全一致。这为典型的II类G蛋白偶联受体的肽结合和信号结构域的取向提供了有力证据。