• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别象形符号意义能力的发展。

The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs.

作者信息

Tolar Tammy D, Lederberg Amy R, Gokhale Sonali, Tomasello Michael

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology & Special Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-3979, USA.

出版信息

J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Spring;13(2):225-40. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm045. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1093/deafed/enm045
PMID:17827446
Abstract

Early developmental psychologists viewed iconic representation as cognitively less complex than other forms of symbolic thought. It is therefore surprising that iconic signs are not acquired more easily than arbitrary signs by young language learners. One explanation is that children younger than 3 years have difficulty interpreting iconicity. The current study assessed hearing children's ability to interpret the meaning of iconic signs. Sixty-six 2.5- to 5-year-olds who had no previous exposure to signs were required to match iconic signs to pictures of referents. Whereas few of the 2.5-year-olds recognized the meaning of the iconic signs consistently, more than half of the 3.0-year-olds and most of 3.5-year-olds performed above chance. Thus, the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs gradually develops during the preschool years. Implications of these findings for sign language development, receptive signed vocabulary tests, and the development of the ability to interpret iconic symbols are discussed.

摘要

早期发展心理学家认为,图像表征在认知上比其他形式的符号思维更为简单。因此,令人惊讶的是,幼儿语言学习者掌握图像符号并不比掌握任意符号更容易。一种解释是,3岁以下的儿童在理解图像性方面存在困难。当前的研究评估了听力正常儿童理解图像符号含义的能力。66名年龄在2.5岁至5岁之间且此前未接触过手语的儿童被要求将图像符号与所指对象的图片进行匹配。2.5岁的儿童中几乎没有人能始终如一地识别图像符号的含义,而3.0岁儿童中有超过一半、3.5岁儿童中的大多数表现高于随机水平。因此,识别图像符号含义的能力在学前阶段逐渐发展。本文讨论了这些发现对手语发展、接受性手语词汇测试以及解释图像符号能力发展的意义。

相似文献

1
The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs.识别象形符号意义能力的发展。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Spring;13(2):225-40. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm045. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
2
Degree and not type of iconicity affects sign language vocabulary acquisition.程度而非象似性类型影响手语词汇习得。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jan;46(1):127-139. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000713. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Recognition of iconicity doesn't come for free.对象似性的识别并非轻而易举。
Dev Sci. 2008 Nov;11(6):841-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00732.x.
4
"I use it when I see it": The role of development and experience in Deaf and hearing children's understanding of iconic gesture.“看到就用它”:发展与经验在聋童和听力正常儿童对标志性手势理解中的作用
Cognition. 2017 May;162:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.015.
5
The association between language and symbolic play at two years: evidence from deaf toddlers.两岁儿童语言与象征性游戏之间的关联:来自失聪幼儿的证据。
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):867-76.
6
Sign language iconicity and its influence on the ability to describe the function of objects.手语的象似性及其对描述物体功能能力的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2004 Nov-Dec;37(6):535-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.008.
7
The link between form and meaning in British sign language: effects of iconicity for phonological decisions.英国手语中形式与意义的联系:象似性对语音决策的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1017-27. doi: 10.1037/a0019339.
8
Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning.语音象征有助于早期动词学习。
Cognition. 2008 Oct;109(1):54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
9
Words and gestures: infants' interpretations of different forms of symbolic reference.言语与手势:婴儿对不同形式象征指称的理解
Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):295-308.
10
Graphic symbols as "the mind on paper": links between children's interpretive theory of mind and symbol understanding.图形符号作为“纸上的思维”:儿童心理理论解释与符号理解之间的联系。
Child Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):186-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01693.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
An ERP investigation of perceptual vs motoric iconicity in sign production.一项关于手语产生中知觉型和运动型象似性的 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Oct 10;203:108966. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108966. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
Sign learning of hearing children in inclusive day care centers-does iconicity matter?融合日托中心中听力正常儿童的符号学习——象似性重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1196114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196114. eCollection 2023.
3
Alternative Object Use in Adults and Children: Embodied Cognitive Bases of Creativity.
成人和儿童的替代性物体使用:创造力的具身认知基础
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:893420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893420. eCollection 2022.
4
Do parents modify child-directed signing to emphasize iconicity?父母是否会调整面向儿童的手语以强调象似性?
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:920729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920729. eCollection 2022.
5
Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal Iconicity and Indexicality.将语言置于现实世界:多模态象似性和指示性的作用。
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 23;4(1):38. doi: 10.5334/joc.113. eCollection 2021.
6
Picture-naming in American Sign Language: an electrophysiological study of the effects of iconicity and structured alignment.美国手语中的图片命名:一项关于象似性和结构对齐效应的电生理研究。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021;36(2):199-210. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1804601. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
7
Lexical Iconicity is differentially favored under transmission in a new sign language: The effect of type of iconicity.在一种新的手语传播过程中,词汇象似性受到不同程度的青睐:象似性类型的影响。
Sign Lang Linguist. 2020;23(1-2):73-95. doi: 10.1075/sll.00044.pye. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
Integrated Communication System: Gesture and Language Acquisition in Typically Developing Children and Children With LD and DLD.综合通信系统:正常发育儿童以及患有学习障碍和发育性语言障碍儿童的手势与语言习得
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 4;11:118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00118. eCollection 2020.
9
Degree and not type of iconicity affects sign language vocabulary acquisition.程度而非象似性类型影响手语词汇习得。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jan;46(1):127-139. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000713. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Actions speak louder than gestures when you are 2 years old.当你 2 岁时,行动比手势更有说服力。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Oct;54(10):1809-1821. doi: 10.1037/dev0000553.