Marwick T H, Go R T, MacIntyre W J, Saha G B, Underwood D A
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.
Eur Heart J. 1991 Oct;12(10):1064-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059838.
The purpose of this study was to compare rubidium-82 PET with thallium-201 SPECT imaging in 150 patients. Both techniques followed a single dipyridamole-handgrip stress, and images were displayed using the same 3-dimensional format and quantitative colour scale. Coronary arteriography was employed to assign the correct diagnosis in situations of disparity. Results of PET and SPECT were at least partially concordant in 110 patients (73%), although 22 had more than one defect. A reversible perfusion defect was identified in 60 patients, but the scans were concordant in only 20 (33%). These disparities were chiefly due to false-negative SPECT imaging (22 patients, 55%), and probable delayed thallium redistribution (13 patients, 33%). No patients had ischaemia correctly identified by SPECT in the presence of normal PET imaging. Persistent defects were identified in 91 patients, some of whom also had reversible defects, and the results were consistent in 54 (59%). Other than the delayed thallium redistribution group, the major categories causing disparities were false-positive (6 patients, 16%), and false negative SPECT (8 patients, 22%), attributable to attenuation and scatter. PET appears able to identify smaller, less ischaemic areas subtended by milder coronary stenoses. The availability of a true resting scan with Rb-PET enhances the discrimination between ischaemia and infarction. Attenuation correction, and the high energy photons of positron annihilation, yield more accurate evaluation of inferior wall defects and greater specificity in the presence of soft tissue attenuation.
本研究的目的是比较150例患者的铷-82正电子发射断层扫描(PET)与铊-201单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像。两种技术均采用单次双嘧达莫-握力负荷试验,图像以相同的三维格式和定量色标显示。在结果不一致的情况下,采用冠状动脉造影来做出正确诊断。PET和SPECT的结果在110例患者(73%)中至少部分一致,尽管有22例存在不止一处缺损。60例患者发现有可逆性灌注缺损,但扫描结果仅在20例(33%)中一致。这些差异主要是由于SPECT成像假阴性(22例患者,55%)以及可能的铊延迟再分布(13例患者,33%)。在PET成像正常的情况下,没有患者通过SPECT正确识别出缺血。91例患者发现有持续性缺损,其中一些患者也有可逆性缺损,结果在54例(59%)中一致。除了铊延迟再分布组外,导致差异的主要类别是假阳性(6例患者,16%)和SPECT假阴性(8例患者,22%),这归因于衰减和散射。PET似乎能够识别由较轻冠状动脉狭窄所对应的较小、缺血程度较轻的区域。Rb-PET可获得真正的静息扫描,这增强了对缺血和梗死的鉴别能力。衰减校正以及正电子湮灭产生的高能光子,可对下壁缺损进行更准确的评估,并且在存在软组织衰减的情况下具有更高的特异性。