Mustanski Brian
University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60608, USA.
Health Psychol. 2007 Sep;26(5):618-26. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.5.618.
To characterize the influence of state and trait affect on HIV risk behaviors.
Men who have sex with men (N = 155) completed reports of trait affect and daily reports of affect and sexual behaviors each night for up to 30 days.
Analyses focused on the role of state and trait positive activation (PA), negative activation (NA), anxious arousal (AA), and sexual activation (SA) on sexual risk taking, operationalized as having a sex partner, a partner-related risk composite, and an HIV risk behavior composite.
State SA was positively associated with having a sex partner and HIV risk behaviors; trait SA was positively associated with partner-related risk. State AA was negatively associated with having a sex partner and positively associated with HIV risk behaviors. Trait AA had a negative association with partner-related risk and moderated the effects of state AA. State PA was negatively associated with HIV risk behaviors, and trait PA had a main effect on having a sex partner. NA had no significant trait or state effects.
These data suggest a role for multiple affective states in sexual risk taking. Models of HIV risk-taking behaviors should be extended to include affective processes.
描述状态情感和特质情感对艾滋病病毒风险行为的影响。
与男性发生性关系的男性（N = 155）完成特质情感报告以及长达30天的每晚情感和性行为的日常报告。
分析聚焦于状态积极激活（PA）、消极激活（NA）、焦虑唤起（AA）和性激活（SA）在性风险行为中的作用，性风险行为通过有性伴侣、与伴侣相关的风险综合指标以及艾滋病病毒风险行为综合指标来衡量。
状态SA与有性伴侣及艾滋病病毒风险行为呈正相关；特质SA与伴侣相关风险呈正相关。状态AA与有性伴侣呈负相关，与艾滋病病毒风险行为呈正相关。特质AA与伴侣相关风险呈负相关，并调节状态AA的影响。状态PA与艾滋病病毒风险行为呈负相关，特质PA对有性伴侣有主要影响。NA没有显著的特质或状态效应。
这些数据表明多种情感状态在性风险行为中发挥作用。艾滋病病毒风险行为模型应扩展至纳入情感过程。
