Suppr超能文献

患有多动症相关问题的临床转诊男孩、他们没有多动症的兄弟以及对照参与者在成年早期对多动症症状进行的回顾性评定。

Retrospective ratings of ADHD symptoms made at young adulthood by clinic-referred boys with ADHD-related problems, their brothers without ADHD, and control participants.

作者信息

Loney Jan, Ledolter Johannes, Kramer John R, Volpe Robert J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):269-80. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.269.

Abstract

Retrospective childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms are required to diagnosis adult ADHD, but the validity of self-rated symptoms across time is questionable. Here, boys with ADHD-related problems, their brothers without ADHD, and former schoolmates rated themselves during young adulthood for ages 9, 14, and 19. Brothers rated probands retrospectively at the same ages. The young adults referred as children for ADHD (a) acknowledged childhood symptoms; (b) described improvement over time; (c) did not differ from brothers or controls on most self-ratings of young adult symptoms; (d) rated themselves as more symptomatic at age 9, but less symptomatic at age 19, than their brothers rated them; and (e) agreed only to some degree with brothers' ratings of probands' aggression (median correlation = .22). Probands' ratings showed limited agreement with judges' symptom ratings (median correlation = .16) and young adult follow-up examiners' ratings (median correlation = .14). These findings are not accounted for solely by changes in informants, nor by the course of ADHD psychopathology. They suggest some stability but limited internal consistency and validity for retrospective ADHD ratings by probands and brothers.

摘要

回顾性童年注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状是诊断成人ADHD所必需的,但自我评定症状随时间推移的有效性存在疑问。在此,患有ADHD相关问题的男孩、他们没有ADHD的兄弟以及以前的同学在成年早期对自己9岁、14岁和19岁时的情况进行了评定。兄弟在相同年龄对先证者进行回顾性评定。那些在儿童期被诊断为ADHD的年轻人:(a)承认童年症状;(b)描述了症状随时间的改善;(c)在大多数成年早期症状的自我评定上与兄弟或对照组没有差异;(d)自我评定在9岁时症状更多,但在19岁时比兄弟评定的症状更少;(e)在某种程度上与兄弟对先证者攻击行为的评定一致(中位数相关性 = 0.22)。先证者的评定与评判者的症状评定(中位数相关性 = 0.16)以及成年早期随访检查者的评定(中位数相关性 = 0.14)显示出有限的一致性。这些发现不能仅由信息提供者的变化来解释,也不能由ADHD精神病理学的病程来解释。它们表明先证者和兄弟对ADHD的回顾性评定具有一定稳定性,但内部一致性和有效性有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验