Suppr超能文献

新规则与既定的疾病证明实践:一项关于挪威初级保健中引入功能评估的焦点小组研究。

New rules meet established sickness certification practice: a focus-group study on the introduction of functional assessments in Norwegian primary care.

作者信息

Krohne Kariann, Brage Søren

机构信息

Section of Occupational and Social Insurance Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Sep;25(3):172-7. doi: 10.1080/02813430701267421.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore how general practitioners view and handle new standards for functional assessments in sickness certification practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focus group interviews. Data were analysed according to Giorgi's phenomenological approach and supported by theories on knowledge.

SETTING

General practitioners from three neighbouring counties in Norway.

SUBJECTS

Four focus groups with a total of 23 participants were recruited through the Norwegian Medical Association and its Continuous Medical Education system.

RESULTS

The participants reported difficulties and reluctance to act in accordance with new functional assessment demands on both a practical and a conceptual level. In established sickness certification practice functional assessment was described as an unspoken part of the medical examination. After the introduction of formal, written functional assessments they identified problems of terminology, communication, and trust. Strategies were developed to circumvent these problems.

CONCLUSIONS

A gap was noticeable between the participants' established practice and the new standards' demand for a more theoretical and communicative functional assessment. The general lack of training, being confronted with new terminology, and increasingly high pressure to reduce sickness absences create an atmosphere of insecurity when assessing function.

摘要

目的

探讨全科医生在疾病证明实践中如何看待和处理功能评估的新标准。

设计

采用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。数据根据 Giorgi 的现象学方法进行分析,并得到知识理论的支持。

背景

挪威三个相邻县的全科医生。

研究对象

通过挪威医学协会及其继续医学教育系统招募了四个焦点小组,共 23 名参与者。

结果

参与者报告称,在实践和概念层面上,按照新的功能评估要求行事存在困难和不情愿。在既定的疾病证明实践中,功能评估被描述为医学检查中不言而喻的一部分。引入正式的书面功能评估后,他们发现了术语、沟通和信任方面的问题。制定了策略来规避这些问题。

结论

参与者既定的实践与新标准对更具理论性和沟通性的功能评估的要求之间存在明显差距。普遍缺乏培训、面对新术语以及减少病假缺勤的压力越来越大,在评估功能时营造了一种不安全的氛围。

相似文献

3
'The sick note': a qualitative study of sickness certification in general practice in Ireland.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2012 Jun;18(2):92-9. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2012.672967. Epub 2012 May 8.
4
Sickness certification difficulties in Ireland--a GP focus group study.
Occup Med (Lond). 2013 Jul;63(5):369-72. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqt056. Epub 2013 May 29.
5
General practitioners' use of sickness certificates.
Occup Med (Lond). 2009 Dec;59(8):580-5. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp147. Epub 2009 Oct 11.
6
General practitioners' relationship to sickness certification.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Mar;25(1):20-6. doi: 10.1080/02813430600879680.
7
Barriers to good sickness certification -- an interview study with Swedish general practitioners.
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jun;36(4):408-14. doi: 10.1177/1403494808090903.
8
Primary care physicians' concerned voices on sickness certification after a period of reorganization. Focus group interviews in Sweden.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):146-155. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1753341. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with general practitioners' contacts with sick-listed patients' employers: A Swedish nationwide questionnaire study.
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Jun;51(4):602-610. doi: 10.1177/14034948211053141. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
3
Assessing work capacity - reviewing the what and how of physicians' clinical practice.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 27;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01134-9.
8
Recommendations to facilitate the ideal fit note: are they achievable in practice?
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 13;16:138. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0360-4.
9
General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia.
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Aug 15;16:100. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0307-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of physician-related factors on sickness certification in primary health care.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Jun;24(2):104-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430500525433.
3
Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 10;328(7431):88. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37949.656389.EE. Epub 2003 Dec 22.
5
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
6
Assessing the needs of patients in pain: a matter of opinion?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2816-23. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00015.
7
Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation.
Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):46-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.46.
8
[Wisdom--knowledge, the patient and the physician].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Mar 20;119(8):1146-8.
9
Quality of work incapacity assessment in the Swiss disability insurance system.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Dec;8(6):567-75. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.6.567.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验