Krohne Kariann, Brage Søren
Section of Occupational and Social Insurance Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Sep;25(3):172-7. doi: 10.1080/02813430701267421.
To explore how general practitioners view and handle new standards for functional assessments in sickness certification practice.
Qualitative study using focus group interviews. Data were analysed according to Giorgi's phenomenological approach and supported by theories on knowledge.
General practitioners from three neighbouring counties in Norway.
Four focus groups with a total of 23 participants were recruited through the Norwegian Medical Association and its Continuous Medical Education system.
The participants reported difficulties and reluctance to act in accordance with new functional assessment demands on both a practical and a conceptual level. In established sickness certification practice functional assessment was described as an unspoken part of the medical examination. After the introduction of formal, written functional assessments they identified problems of terminology, communication, and trust. Strategies were developed to circumvent these problems.
A gap was noticeable between the participants' established practice and the new standards' demand for a more theoretical and communicative functional assessment. The general lack of training, being confronted with new terminology, and increasingly high pressure to reduce sickness absences create an atmosphere of insecurity when assessing function.
探讨全科医生在疾病证明实践中如何看待和处理功能评估的新标准。
采用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。数据根据 Giorgi 的现象学方法进行分析,并得到知识理论的支持。
挪威三个相邻县的全科医生。
通过挪威医学协会及其继续医学教育系统招募了四个焦点小组,共 23 名参与者。
参与者报告称,在实践和概念层面上,按照新的功能评估要求行事存在困难和不情愿。在既定的疾病证明实践中,功能评估被描述为医学检查中不言而喻的一部分。引入正式的书面功能评估后,他们发现了术语、沟通和信任方面的问题。制定了策略来规避这些问题。
参与者既定的实践与新标准对更具理论性和沟通性的功能评估的要求之间存在明显差距。普遍缺乏培训、面对新术语以及减少病假缺勤的压力越来越大,在评估功能时营造了一种不安全的氛围。