Schwartz Marlan, Abbott Karen Rae, Glazerman Larry, Sobolewski Craig, Jarnagin Barry, Ailawadi Radhika, Lucente Vincent
Lifeline Medical Associates, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):570-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.01.008.
To evaluate the use of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament repair for long-term patient symptom improvement in patients with uterine prolapse or posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and to evaluate how laparoscopic instrumentation kits facilitate procedure performance for the surgeon.
Nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter case series (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Five clinical sites consisting of 4 community hospitals and 1 university medical center.
Seventy-two patients with stage II or worse uterine prolapse (58%, n = 42) or posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (42%, n = 30). One patient with stage I vaginal vault prolapse was included in the group due to her significant symptoms.
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament repair was performed on all patients; round ligament truncation was also performed selectively on patients with uterine prolapse. Fifty-seven percent (41 patients) had concomitant pelvic procedures.
At 12-month follow-up, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) scores and patient self-reported symptom scores were significantly improved over baseline after laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Positive mean change in POP-Q score was 14.4 (p = .0003) for uterine prolapse repair and 9.28 (p = .017) for vaginal vault prolapse repair. Positive mean change in total symptom score was 20.36 (p <.0001) for uterine prolapse repair and 11.43 (p = .005) for vaginal vault prolapse repair. Surgeons reported a mean procedure time of 31.6 minutes for uterine prolapse repair and 21.7 minutes for vaginal vault prolapse repair. A mean rating of 7.5 was documented for ease of use for the uterine prolapse kit and 4.1 for the vaginal vault prolapse kit on a scale of 1 to 10.
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament repair improves symptoms and POP-Q scores over the long term in patients with uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Laparoscopic instrumentation kits facilitate procedure performance for the surgeon with expedited surgery times.
评估腹腔镜子宫骶韧带修复术对子宫脱垂或子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂患者长期症状改善的效果,并评估腹腔镜器械套件如何方便外科医生进行手术。
非随机、前瞻性、多中心病例系列研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。
由4家社区医院和1所大学医学中心组成的5个临床地点。
72例II期或更严重子宫脱垂患者(58%,n = 42)或子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂患者(42%,n = 30)。1例I期阴道穹窿脱垂患者因症状严重被纳入该组。
对所有患者进行腹腔镜子宫骶韧带修复术;对子宫脱垂患者还选择性地进行圆韧带截断术。57%(41例患者)同时进行了盆腔手术。
在12个月的随访中,盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)评分和患者自我报告的症状评分在腹腔镜修复盆腔器官脱垂后较基线有显著改善。子宫脱垂修复术的POP-Q评分平均正向变化为14.4(p = .0003),阴道穹窿脱垂修复术为9.28(p = .017)。子宫脱垂修复术的总症状评分平均正向变化为20.36(p <.0001),阴道穹窿脱垂修复术为11.43(p = .005)。外科医生报告子宫脱垂修复术的平均手术时间为31.6分钟,阴道穹窿脱垂修复术为21.7分钟。子宫脱垂套件的易用性平均评分为7.5分(满分10分),阴道穹窿脱垂套件为4.1分。
腹腔镜子宫骶韧带修复术可长期改善子宫或阴道穹窿脱垂患者的症状和POP-Q评分。腹腔镜器械套件通过缩短手术时间方便外科医生进行手术。