Andreola Barbara, Bressan Silvia, Callegaro Silvia, Liverani Anna, Plebani Mario, Da Dalt Liviana
Department of Pediatrics, University of Padova, Italy.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Aug;26(8):672-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31806215e3.
To assess the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP), compared with that of total white-blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC), in predicting severe bacterial infections (SBIs) in febrile children admitted to Emergency Department.
A prospective study was conducted in 408 children aged 7-days to 36-months, admitted with fever without source, at a tertiary care Pediatric Emergency Department. PCT, CRP, WBC, and ANC were determined upon admission and compared. Specificity, sensitivity, multilevel likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariate stepwise logistic regression were carried out.
SBI was diagnosed in 94 children (23.1%). PCT, CRP, WBC, and ANC were significantly higher in this group than in non-SBI patients. The area under the ROC (AUC) obtained was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86) for PCT, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.88) for CRP (P = 0.358), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75) for WBC, and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.78) for ANC. Only PCT (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.11-1.57; P < 0.001) and CRP (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001) were retained as significant predictors of SBI in a multiple regression model. For infants with fever <8 hours (n = 45), AUC for PCT and CRP were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80-0.98) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.87), respectively (P = 0.056).
Both PCT and CRP are valuable markers in predicting SBI in children with fever without source and they perform better than WBC and ANC. PCT appears more accurate at the beginning of infections, but overall CRP may be the most convenient marker for its better sensitivity and feasibility.
在预测急诊科收治的发热儿童严重细菌感染(SBI)方面,评估降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)相对于白细胞总数(WBC)和中性粒细胞绝对值(ANC)的价值。
在一家三级医疗儿科急诊科,对408名年龄7天至36个月、因不明原因发热入院的儿童进行了一项前瞻性研究。入院时测定并比较PCT、CRP、WBC和ANC。进行了特异性、敏感性、多级似然比、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和多变量逐步逻辑回归。
94名儿童(23.1%)被诊断为SBI。该组的PCT、CRP、WBC和ANC显著高于非SBI患者。PCT的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.82(95%CI:0.78 - 0.86),CRP为0.85(95%CI:0.81 - 0.88)(P = 0.358),WBC为0.71(95%CI:0.66 - 0.75),ANC为0.74(95%CI:0.70 - 0.78)。在多元回归模型中,只有PCT(OR:1.32;95%CI:1.11 - 1.57;P < 0.001)和CRP(OR:1.02;95%CI:1.01 - 1.03;P < 0.001)被保留为SBI的显著预测指标。对于发热<8小时的婴儿(n = 45),PCT和CRP的AUC分别为0.92(95%CI:0.80 - 0.98)和0.75(95%CI:0.60 - 0.87)(P = 0.056)。
PCT和CRP都是预测不明原因发热儿童SBI的有价值标志物,且它们比WBC和ANC表现更好。在感染初期,PCT似乎更准确,但总体而言,CRP可能因其更好的敏感性和可行性而成为最方便的标志物。