Callahan Dale, Waugh Jonathan, Mathew George Allen, Granger Wesley M
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2007 Jul-Aug;41(4):318-23. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2007)41[318:SWAWH]2.0.CO;2.
This paper develops an objective methodology to test the audio quality of stethoscopes, classifies stethoscopes into five functional categories, and compares the audio performance of each of the five categories. These categories, based on the manufacturer's recommended use, are basic assessment, cardiology, disposable, high-end cardiology, and physical assessment. The classification into categories is based on the intended performance of the stethoscopes as provided by the manufacturers. After developing the procedures and running more than 500 tests, the stethoscope with the least amount of loss over the spectrum was chosen from each of the five categories; the five were then compared to one another. Thirty-nine stethoscopes from 11 manufacturers were used in this study. The objective test methodology allows for side-by-side comparison of stethoscopes from various manufacturers that is independent of the manufacturer's published test results.
本文开发了一种客观的方法来测试听诊器的音频质量,将听诊器分为五个功能类别,并比较这五个类别的音频性能。根据制造商的推荐用途,这些类别分别为基本评估、心脏病学、一次性、高端心脏病学和身体评估。分类是基于制造商提供的听诊器预期性能。在制定程序并进行了500多次测试后,从五个类别中分别选出了频谱损失最小的听诊器;然后将这五个听诊器相互比较。本研究使用了来自11个制造商的39个听诊器。这种客观的测试方法允许对来自不同制造商的听诊器进行并排比较,且独立于制造商公布的测试结果。