Suppr超能文献

听诊器:我们听到了什么?

Stethoscopes: what are we hearing?

作者信息

Callahan Dale, Waugh Jonathan, Mathew George Allen, Granger Wesley M

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Instrum Technol. 2007 Jul-Aug;41(4):318-23. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2007)41[318:SWAWH]2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

This paper develops an objective methodology to test the audio quality of stethoscopes, classifies stethoscopes into five functional categories, and compares the audio performance of each of the five categories. These categories, based on the manufacturer's recommended use, are basic assessment, cardiology, disposable, high-end cardiology, and physical assessment. The classification into categories is based on the intended performance of the stethoscopes as provided by the manufacturers. After developing the procedures and running more than 500 tests, the stethoscope with the least amount of loss over the spectrum was chosen from each of the five categories; the five were then compared to one another. Thirty-nine stethoscopes from 11 manufacturers were used in this study. The objective test methodology allows for side-by-side comparison of stethoscopes from various manufacturers that is independent of the manufacturer's published test results.

摘要

本文开发了一种客观的方法来测试听诊器的音频质量,将听诊器分为五个功能类别,并比较这五个类别的音频性能。根据制造商的推荐用途,这些类别分别为基本评估、心脏病学、一次性、高端心脏病学和身体评估。分类是基于制造商提供的听诊器预期性能。在制定程序并进行了500多次测试后,从五个类别中分别选出了频谱损失最小的听诊器;然后将这五个听诊器相互比较。本研究使用了来自11个制造商的39个听诊器。这种客观的测试方法允许对来自不同制造商的听诊器进行并排比较,且独立于制造商公布的测试结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验