Suppr超能文献

开发一种用于指导神经肌肉疾病患者转诊至联合健康服务机构的工具。第二部分。

Development of a tool to guide referral of patients with neuromuscular disorders to allied health services. Part two.

作者信息

Pieterse Allan J, Cup Edith H C, Knuijt Simone, Akkermans Reinier, Hendricks Henk T, van Engelen Baziel G M, van der Wilt Gert-Jan, Oostendorp Rob A B

机构信息

Research Centre for Allied Health Sciences, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(11):863-70. doi: 10.1080/09638280701403460.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Perceived Limitations and Needs Questionnaire (PLAN-Q) was developed to guide referral for a one-off consultation by occupational therapy (OT), physical therapy (PT), and speech therapy (ST) consultation, to provide a tailor-made advice on allied health interventions. This article reports on the testing of validity and reliability of the PLAN-Q.

METHODS

In the validation study, 208 patients with a broad spectrum of neuromuscular disorders completed the PLAN-Q, Medical Outcome Study short-form 36-item version (SF-36), and the Impact of Participation on Autonomy (IPA) questionnaires. A subsection of 51 patients, whose physical condition was stable, participated in the evaluation of the intra-rater reliability of the questionnaire. The theoretical construct was tested with factorial analysis, subscales were constructed and reliability and validity of the PLAN-Q subscales were assessed.

RESULTS

Factorial analysis resulted in an 18-item self-report questionnaire. Items were grouped into four subscales ('physical capacity', 'transferring', 'oropharyngeal capacity', and 'hand-use'), each with two dimensions ('capacity' and 'need for help'). The internal consistency of all subscales was good (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77-0.94) as well as the intra-rater reliability of the subscales 'physical capacity' and 'transferring' in the 'capacity' dimension (Kappa: 0.70-0.75). The 'need' dimension showed poor intra-rater reliability suggesting that 'need for help' is a variable phenomenon that changes between two points of measurement. The construct validity of the subscales against the SF-36 and the IPA was satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

The PLAN-Q is a valid self-report instrument that measures patients' perception of capacity and needs in domains relevant to referral for a one-off OT, PT, or ST consultation.

摘要

目的

感知限制与需求问卷(PLAN-Q)旨在指导职业治疗(OT)、物理治疗(PT)和言语治疗(ST)的一次性咨询转诊,为联合健康干预提供量身定制的建议。本文报告了PLAN-Q的效度和信度测试情况。

方法

在效度研究中,208名患有广泛神经肌肉疾病的患者完成了PLAN-Q、医学结局研究简明36项版本(SF-36)以及参与对自主性的影响(IPA)问卷。51名身体状况稳定的患者参与了问卷评分者内部信度的评估。通过因子分析对理论结构进行测试,构建子量表并评估PLAN-Q子量表的信度和效度。

结果

因子分析得出一份包含18个条目的自填式问卷。条目被分为四个子量表(“身体能力”、“转移”、“口咽能力”和“手部使用”),每个子量表有两个维度(“能力”和“需要帮助”)。所有子量表的内部一致性良好(Cronbach's α系数:0.77 - 0.94),“身体能力”和“转移”子量表在“能力”维度的评分者内部信度也良好(Kappa系数:0.70 - 0.75)。“需要”维度的评分者内部信度较差,这表明“需要帮助”是一种在两次测量之间会发生变化的可变现象。子量表相对于SF-36和IPA的结构效度令人满意。

结论

PLAN-Q是一种有效的自填式工具,可测量患者在与一次性OT、PT或ST咨询转诊相关领域的能力感知和需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验