Hall Nicoline Marie, Berntsen Dorthe
Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Memory. 2008 Jan;16(1):48-57. doi: 10.1080/09658210701333271.
Clinical theories of post-traumatic stress disorder often claim that intrusive (involuntary) memories favour emotionally stressful material and that these memories come with more sensory imagery and emotional reliving compared to voluntary memories. However, these assumptions have not been verified experimentally. Here we obtained recordings of emotional reactions to aversive pictures at the time of encoding, as well as records of involuntary and voluntary memories of these pictures in a subsequent diary study. A comparison of individual ratings, obtained during encoding, of pictures recalled involuntarily and voluntarily showed that emotional stress at encoding increased overall accessibility, independent of whether recall was voluntary or involuntary. However at the time of recall, voluntary memories scored higher on narrative content and on measures of imagery. The findings are compatible with research on emotion and memory in general, but challenge clinical claims of differential involuntary versus voluntary access to emotionally stressful events.
创伤后应激障碍的临床理论常常声称,侵入性(非自愿)记忆倾向于存储情绪上有压力的材料,并且与自愿记忆相比,这些记忆伴随着更多的感官意象和情绪重现。然而,这些假设尚未得到实验验证。在此,我们获取了编码时对厌恶图片的情绪反应记录,以及随后日记研究中对这些图片的非自愿和自愿记忆记录。对编码期间获得的非自愿和自愿回忆图片的个体评分进行比较后发现,编码时的情绪压力增加了总体可及性,而与回忆是自愿还是非自愿无关。然而在回忆时,自愿记忆在叙事内容和意象测量方面得分更高。这些发现总体上与情绪和记忆的研究相符,但对关于非自愿与自愿获取情绪压力事件存在差异的临床说法提出了挑战。