de Almeida A M, Gracias C W, dos Santos N M, Aldeia F J
Facuklade de Medicina de Lisboa, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria.
Acta Med Port. 1991 Sep-Oct;4(5):257-62.
One-stage subtotal colectomy of an acutely obstructed left colon would improve quality of life while shortening the length of hospitalization. Prohibitive mortality rates, however, are ascribed to such an approach. Analyzing the Senior Author's experience we compared the one-stage approach versus the multi-stage resections concerning operative mortality and morbidity rates and the duration of hospitalization. Forty-nine of 291 (17%) large bowel cancers presented acute left-sided obstruction requiring emergency surgery. Colostomy alone was performed in 18 (37%), multi-stage colectomy in 20 (41%, Group A) and one-stage subtotal colectomy in 11 (22%, Group B, all of them after 1979), the years under scrutiny being from 1973 through Sept. 1990. Both groups were comparable in age and sex distribution, TNM staging and ASA classification. Operative mortality and morbidity rates were 10% and 30% in Group A, 9% and 18% in Group B, respectively. The average length of hospitalization was 21.25 days (14-30) in Group A, 9.18 days (7-14) in Group B. Whenever an experienced surgical team is available and in the absence of contra-indications (local factors precluding a swift dissection, hemodynamic instability, gangrenous bowel) a one-stage subtotal colectomy, taking advantage of a better healing ileo-sigmoid or ileo-rectal anastomosis, carries acceptable mortality and morbidity rates while enhancing the quality of life and shortening the length of hospitalization. It should be considered the choice procedure, provided selection requirements and technical demands are met. An evaluation of the Senior Author's team experience (1973-90) in the management of acutely obstructing left colon cancer (49/291 or 17%) provides information on multi-stage resections and one-stage subtotal colectomy (Group A and B) as regards operative mortality (10% in Group A, 9% in Group B) as well as length of hospitalization (21 days in Group A, 9 days in Group B).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对急性梗阻性左半结肠进行一期次全结肠切除术可提高生活质量并缩短住院时间。然而,这种方法的死亡率过高。通过分析资深作者的经验,我们比较了一期手术方法与多期切除术在手术死亡率、发病率以及住院时间方面的差异。291例大肠癌中有49例(17%)出现急性左侧梗阻需要急诊手术。仅行结肠造口术的有18例(37%),行多期结肠切除术的有20例(41%,A组),行一期次全结肠切除术的有11例(22%,B组,均在1979年之后),研究时间段为1973年至1990年9月。两组在年龄、性别分布、TNM分期和ASA分级方面具有可比性。A组的手术死亡率和发病率分别为10%和30%,B组分别为9%和18%。A组的平均住院时间为21.25天(14 - 30天);B组为9.18天(7 - 14天)。只要有经验丰富的手术团队且不存在禁忌证(妨碍快速解剖的局部因素、血流动力学不稳定、肠坏疽),一期次全结肠切除术利用更好愈合的回肠 - 乙状结肠或回肠 - 直肠吻合术,具有可接受的死亡率和发病率,同时能提高生活质量并缩短住院时间。如果满足选择要求和技术需求,应将其视为首选手术方式。对资深作者团队(1973 - 90年)处理急性梗阻性左半结肠癌(49/291或17%)的经验评估提供了多期切除术和一期次全结肠切除术(A组和B组)在手术死亡率(A组10%,B组9%)以及住院时间(A组21天,B组9天)方面的信息。(摘要截断于250字)