Suppr超能文献

发作性睡病患者认知障碍的计算机化评估。

Computerized assessment of cognitive impairment in narcoleptic patients.

作者信息

Ha K S, Yoo H K, Lyoo I K, Jeong D U

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bungdang Hospital, Kyeonggi, Korea.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 Nov;116(5):312-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00891.x. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES - This study was aimed to investigate the comprehensive range of cognitive performance using the objective computerized assessment system in narcolepsy and age, gender, and IQ-matched healthy comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS - The cognitive functions of 24 patients with narcolepsy and 24 healthy comparison subjects were assessed. RESULTS - Narcoleptics performed more frequent omission and commission errors in the vigilance test, and more frequent omission errors in the continuous performance test. Narcoleptics' response time was slower than healthy volunteers, and the differences were more exaggerated in more complex tasks. The simple repetitious working performance was more impaired in the narcoleptic subjects than in healthy comparison subjects. Narcolepsy group showed worse performances in the determination unit than the comparison group, and this impairment became more salient in faster stimuli relative to slower ones. CONCLUSIONS - Narcoleptics have deficits of efficiency in attention allocation and execution as well as simple vigilance problem.

摘要

目的——本研究旨在使用客观计算机化评估系统,对发作性睡病患者以及年龄、性别和智商匹配的健康对照者的认知表现进行全面调查。材料与方法——对24例发作性睡病患者和24例健康对照者的认知功能进行评估。结果——发作性睡病患者在警觉性测试中出现遗漏和错误的频率更高,在连续操作测试中出现遗漏错误的频率更高。发作性睡病患者的反应时间比健康志愿者慢,且在更复杂的任务中差异更为明显。发作性睡病患者的简单重复性工作表现比健康对照者受损更严重。发作性睡病组在判断单元的表现比对照组差,并且相对于较慢的刺激,在较快的刺激下这种损害变得更加明显。结论——发作性睡病患者在注意力分配和执行效率方面存在缺陷,同时存在简单的警觉问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验