Speekenbrink Maarten, Channon Shelley, Shanks David R
Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(2):292-310. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.005.
Previous research suggests that early performance of amnesic individuals in a probabilistic category learning task is relatively unimpaired. When combined with impaired declarative knowledge, this is taken as evidence for the existence of separate implicit and explicit memory systems. The present study contains a more fine-grained analysis of learning than earlier studies. Using a dynamic lens model approach with plausible learning models, we found that the learning process is indeed indistinguishable between an amnesic and control group. However, in contrast to earlier findings, we found that explicit knowledge of the task structure is also good in both the amnesic and the control group. This is inconsistent with a crucial prediction from the multiple-systems account. The results can be explained from a single system account and previously found differences in later categorization performance can be accounted for by a difference in learning rate.
先前的研究表明,失忆个体在概率类别学习任务中的早期表现相对未受损害。当与受损的陈述性知识相结合时,这被视为存在独立的内隐和外显记忆系统的证据。本研究对学习的分析比早期研究更为细致。使用具有合理学习模型的动态透镜模型方法,我们发现失忆组和对照组之间的学习过程确实没有区别。然而,与早期研究结果相反,我们发现失忆组和对照组对任务结构的外显知识也都很好。这与多系统理论的一个关键预测不一致。这些结果可以从单一系统理论来解释,先前在后期分类表现中发现的差异可以用学习率的差异来解释。