应对治疗惰性：治疗数据在质量指标中的作用。
Tackling therapeutic inertia: role of treatment data in quality indicators.
作者信息
Guthrie Bruce, Inkster Melanie, Fahey Tom
机构信息
Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4BF.
出版信息
BMJ. 2007 Sep 15;335(7619):542-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39259.400069.AD.
Abstract
Many patients with hypertension remain undertreated despite the apparent rosy picture given by doctors meeting current targets. Different measures are needed to overcome therapeutic inertia, argue and
摘要
尽管医生达到当前治疗目标的情况看似乐观，但许多高血压患者仍未得到充分治疗。需要采取不同措施来克服治疗惰性，有人认为…… （原文最后“argue and”表述不完整，可能影响准确理解）
相似文献
1
Tackling therapeutic inertia: role of treatment data in quality indicators.应对治疗惰性：治疗数据在质量指标中的作用。
BMJ. 2007 Sep 15;335(7619):542-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39259.400069.AD.
2
NCQA Report shows quality improvement, but more best practice care needed.国家质量保证委员会（NCQA）报告显示质量有所改善，但仍需更多最佳实践护理。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 2002 Oct;14(10):12-3.
3
Awareness, treatment, and control of major cardiovascular risk factors in a small-scale Italian community: results of a screening campaign.意大利一个小规模社区中主要心血管危险因素的知晓、治疗与控制：一项筛查活动的结果
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:177-85. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S40925. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
4
Hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and their combinations increased health care utilization and decreased health status.高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症及其合并症增加了医疗保健的使用并降低了健康状况。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;57(9):954-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.011.
5
E-mailing doctors improves care.给医生发电子邮件可改善医疗服务。
Consum Rep. 2010 Oct;75(10):14.
6
Caring for adults with severe mental illness and physical health problems.照顾患有严重精神疾病和身体健康问题的成年人。
Br J Nurs. 2016 Dec 8;25(22):1266-1267. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.22.1266.
7
Warnings about vulnerability in clients with diabetes and hypertension.关于糖尿病和高血压患者易感性的警告。
Qual Health Res. 2000 Jul;10(4):521-37. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118615.
8
Risk strata and quality of care for the elderly in Primary Health Care.初级卫生保健中老年人的风险分层与护理质量。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Oct 7;27:e3166. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2968.3166. eCollection 2019.
9
Participation in the Journey to Life Conversation Map Improves Control of Hypertension, Diabetes, and Hypercholesterolemia.参与“生命之旅对话地图”可改善高血压、糖尿病和高胆固醇血症的控制。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):767-71. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.06.140142.
10
Forcing medical care on prisoners. Case for discussion.强迫囚犯接受医疗护理。讨论案例。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1980;38:189-90.
引用本文的文献
1
Triple Antihypertensive Medication Prediction Score After Intracerebral Hemorrhage (the TRICH Score).脑出血后三联抗高血压药物预测评分（TRICH评分）。
Neurology. 2025 May 13;104(9):e213560. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213560. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes is often delayed, but access to a diabetes nurse may help-insights from Norwegian general practice.在有 2 型糖尿病的患者中，胰岛素起始治疗常常被延迟，但获得糖尿病护士的帮助可能会有所帮助——来自挪威全科医疗的观察。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):132-143. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2296118. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
3
Modelling factors associated with therapeutic inertia in hypertensive patients: Analysis using repeated data from a hospital registry in West Africa.分析西非某医院注册数据库中的重复数据，建立与高血压患者治疗惰性相关的影响因素模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e31147. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031147.
4
Why evidence still matters to general practice: James Mackenzie Lecture 2019.为何证据对全科医疗仍至关重要：2019年詹姆斯·麦肯齐讲座
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar 26;70(693):198-199. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X709241. Print 2020 Apr.
5
Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Health Care Clinics in Central Bosnia.中波斯尼亚初级保健诊所 2 型糖尿病患者的临床惰性。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Nov 13;24:8141-8149. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911286.
6
Intervention planning for a digital intervention for self-management of hypertension: a theory-, evidence- and person-based approach.高血压自我管理数字干预的干预规划：一种基于理论、证据和个体的方法。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 23;12(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0553-4.
7
Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) digital intervention for self-management of uncontrolled, essential hypertension: a protocol for the randomised controlled HOME BP trial.家庭与在线血压管理及评估（HOME BP）数字干预用于未控制的原发性高血压自我管理：一项随机对照HOME BP试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 7;6(11):e012684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012684.
8
Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand adherence to multiple evidence-based indicators in primary care: a qualitative study.运用理论领域框架（TDF）理解初级保健中对多种循证指标的依从性：一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2016 Aug 8;11:113. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0479-2.
9
Potentially inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP and START and adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people: a prospective cohort study.根据STOPP和START标准评估社区老年人潜在不适当用药情况及其不良后果：一项前瞻性队列研究
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):849-57. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12995. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
10
Developing 'high impact' guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus process.为英国初级医疗保健制定基于指南的“高影响力”质量指标：多阶段共识达成过程
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 28;16:156. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0350-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.英国全科医疗中的绩效薪酬计划。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa055505.
2
Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.针对血压控制不佳、血脂异常和糖尿病的治疗调整。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):475-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00006.
3
Adherence to antihypertensive medication and association with patient and practice factors.抗高血压药物的依从性及其与患者和医疗实践因素的关联。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Apr;20(4):295-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001981.
4
Organisational factors in relation to control of blood pressure: an observational study.与血压控制相关的组织因素：一项观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Dec;55(521):931-7.
5
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响：一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
6
A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial.一项旨在改善心血管疾病预防护理的多方法质量改进干预措施：一项整群随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):523-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00008.
7
Quality improvement initiatives: issues in moving from diabetes guidelines to policy.
Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27 Suppl 2:B54-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.suppl_2.b54.
8
British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary.2004年英国高血压学会高血压管理指南（BHS-IV）：总结
BMJ. 2004 Mar 13;328(7440):634-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7440.634.
9
Hypertension control: how well are we doing?高血压控制：我们做得如何？
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(22):2705-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.22.2705.
10
The influence of absolute cardiovascular risk, patient utilities, and costs on the decision to treat hypertension: a Markov decision analysis.绝对心血管风险、患者效用及成本对高血压治疗决策的影响：一项马尔可夫决策分析
J Hypertens. 2003 Sep;21(9):1753-9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200309000-00026.
Zotero 插件