Stanczyk Frank Z, Lee Jennifer S, Santen Richard J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, Room 1M2, 1240 North Mission Road, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Sep;16(9):1713-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0765.
Lack of standardization of high-quality steroid hormone assays is a major deficiency in epidemiologic studies. In postmenopausal women, reported levels of serum 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) are highly variable and median normal values differ by approximately a 6-fold factor. A particular problem is the use of E(2) assays for prediction of breast cancer risk and osteoporotic fractures, where assay sensitivity may be the most important factor. Identification of women in the lowest categories of E(2) levels will likely provide prognostic information that would not be available in a large group of women in whom E(2) levels are undetectable by less sensitive assays. Detailed and costly methods involving extraction and chromatography in conjunction with RIA provide generally acceptable E(2) results in postmenopausal serum, whereas less tedious, direct immunoassays suffer from inadequate specificity and sensitivity. Studies comparing the two types of methods generally report higher E(2) values with the direct methods as a result of cross-reactivity with other steroids and reduced correlation with biological variables such as body mass index. Similar problems exist with measurements of E(2) and estrone in men, and estrone and testosterone in women. Interest in mass spectrometry-based assays is increasing as potential gold standard methods with enhanced sensitivity and specificity; however, these assays require costly instrumentation and highly trained personnel. Taking all of these issues into consideration, we propose establishment of standard pools of premenopausal, postmenopausal, and male serum, and utilization of these for cross-comparison of various methods on an international basis. An oversight group could then establish standards based on these comparisons and set agreed upon confidence limits of various hormones in the pools. These criteria would allow validation of sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of current steroid hormone assay methodology and provide surrogates until a true gold standard can be developed.
高质量类固醇激素检测缺乏标准化是流行病学研究中的一个主要缺陷。在绝经后女性中,报告的血清17β-雌二醇(E₂)水平高度可变,正常中位值相差约6倍。一个特别的问题是使用E₂检测来预测乳腺癌风险和骨质疏松性骨折,其中检测灵敏度可能是最重要的因素。识别E₂水平处于最低类别的女性可能会提供在一大群使用不太灵敏的检测方法无法检测到E₂水平的女性中无法获得的预后信息。涉及提取和色谱法结合放射免疫分析的详细且昂贵的方法通常能在绝经后血清中提供可接受的E₂结果,而不太繁琐的直接免疫分析则存在特异性和灵敏度不足的问题。比较这两种方法类型的研究通常报告直接法的E₂值更高,这是由于与其他类固醇的交叉反应以及与体重指数等生物学变量的相关性降低。男性中E₂和雌酮的测量以及女性中雌酮和睾酮的测量也存在类似问题。基于质谱的检测作为具有更高灵敏度和特异性的潜在金标准方法,其受关注程度正在增加;然而,这些检测需要昂贵的仪器设备和训练有素的人员。考虑到所有这些问题,我们建议建立绝经前、绝经后和男性血清的标准库,并在国际范围内利用这些标准库对各种方法进行交叉比较。然后一个监督小组可以根据这些比较建立标准,并设定库中各种激素的商定置信限。这些标准将允许验证当前类固醇激素检测方法的灵敏度、特异性、精密度和准确性,并在开发出真正的金标准之前提供替代指标。