Beane E A, Beck J C
Cambridge Court Clinic, MA 02141.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1991;19(4):359-66.
Problem. To study court ordered substance abuse commitment (SAC) in one jurisdiction. We investigated who was evaluated, by whom, and with what outcome. Is SAC primarily a purely civil procedure as originally intended? Are men and women being treated equally?
Questionnaire survey of court clinicians to determine demographic and clinical status of persons evaluated, the process of evaluation, and the disposition.
SAC is common and more frequent in criminal cases than in purely civil ones. SAC of women is clearly influenced by the restricted choices for disposition: either state prison or an unlocked facility.
SAC is an important public health procedure, which courts are using in highly variable and at times unintended ways. SAC has emerged as an alternative to other dispositions in criminal cases involving substance-abusing defendants.
问题。研究一个司法辖区内法院下令的药物滥用强制收治(SAC)情况。我们调查了接受评估的人员、评估者以及评估结果。SAC最初的意图主要是一种纯粹的民事程序吗?男女是否得到平等对待?
对法院临床医生进行问卷调查,以确定接受评估人员的人口统计学和临床状况、评估过程及处置情况。
SAC很常见,在刑事案件中比在纯粹的民事案件中更频繁。女性的SAC明显受到处置选择受限的影响:要么是州立监狱,要么是无锁设施。
SAC是一项重要的公共卫生程序,法院在以高度可变且有时是意想不到的方式使用它。SAC已成为涉及药物滥用被告的刑事案件中其他处置方式的替代方案。