Suppr超能文献

[内科某科室的药物可及性与世界卫生组织基本药物清单的适配性]

[Adequancy of the pharmacological disponibility in a Department of Internal Medicine to the WHO essential drug list].

作者信息

Díaz Peromingo J A, Villamil Cajoto I, Buján de Gonzalo L

机构信息

Servicios de Medicina Interna y Farmacia, Hospital da Barbanza, Riveira, A Coruña, Spain.

出版信息

An Med Interna. 2007 Apr;24(4):173-6. doi: 10.4321/s0212-71992007000400004.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since several years ago, the World Health Organization (WHO), publishes the Essential Drug List (EDL) including medicines that are used to cover the mayor health community problems. Drugs are selected in terms of importance, usefulness, safety and cost-effectiveness. There is no enough data about adequacy between this list and the current medical practise in Internal Medicine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Both EDL (13 edition, reviewed on April 2003) and the list of medicines used in the Internal Medicine Department from the Hospital da Barbanza, Riveira, A Coruña (Spain), Fundación Pública del Servizo Galego de Saúde in 2004-2005 were compared.

RESULTS

From the 27 groups included in the EDL, 2 groups were excluded because no regular use in Internal Medicine. Among the other 25 groups there were significant differences in 24 groups. Just in one group both lists were identical. In all the 24 groups with differences, we used an smaller amount of drugs that recommended in the EDL. We analysed 15 groups (the groups with at least 5 differences between both lists). Causes identified were as follows: drugs used in diseases that we used to send to another hospital (Reference Hospital) in groups 6,8 and 12; drugs not commonly prescribed in Internal Medicine in groups 1,4,13,14,18,19 and 21, and finally drugs not currently financed by the National Health System (group 27).

CONCLUSIONS

After examining the adequacy of the list of drugs prescribed in Internal Medicine in a Community Hospital we conclude that its use is significantly lower than the standard recommendations derived from de WHO. Identified causes are treatments not covered in a Community Hospital needing to transfer patients to another hospital and the inclusion of drugs not commonly used in Internal Medicine. The WHO estimates that over 2000 million people can not currently access to essential drugs nor vaccines all over the world. The problem is not just a health problem but also a social, economic and ethic one. So, an accurate use of such essential drugs in developed Health Systems could be a good example of efficiency.

摘要

引言

多年来,世界卫生组织(WHO)发布基本药物清单(EDL),其中包含用于解决主要健康问题的药物。药物是根据重要性、实用性、安全性和成本效益来选择的。关于这份清单与当前内科医学实践之间的适配性,尚无足够数据。

材料与方法

对EDL(2003年4月修订的第13版)与西班牙拉科鲁尼亚省里韦拉市巴尔班萨医院内科在2004 - 2005年使用的药品清单进行了比较。

结果

在EDL包含的27个组中,有2个组因在内科不常使用而被排除。在其他25个组中,有24个组存在显著差异。只有1个组的两份清单完全相同。在所有存在差异的24个组中,我们使用的药物数量比EDL中推荐的要少。我们分析了15个组(两份清单之间至少有5处差异的组)。确定的原因如下:第6、8和12组中用于我们通常会转诊至其他医院(参考医院)治疗疾病的药物;第1、4、13、14、18、19和21组中内科不常开具的药物,以及最后第27组中目前未由国家卫生系统资助的药物。

结论

在检查了一家社区医院内科开具的药物清单的适配性后,我们得出结论,其使用量显著低于源自WHO的标准推荐量。确定的原因是社区医院未涵盖的治疗需要将患者转诊至其他医院,以及纳入了内科不常用的药物。WHO估计,目前全世界有超过20亿人无法获得基本药物和疫苗。这个问题不仅是一个健康问题,也是一个社会、经济和伦理问题。因此,在发达的卫生系统中准确使用此类基本药物可能是效率的一个良好范例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验