• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体供肾肾切除术移植肾存活率的比较:手辅助腹腔镜手术与开放手术

Comparison of graft survival in live donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic v open procedures.

作者信息

Lee Kyu-Sung, Hong Jeong Hee, Jeon Seong Soo, Choi Han Yong, Kim Sung Joo, Lee Sung Won

机构信息

Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2007 Aug;21(8):866-71. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0463.

DOI:10.1089/end.2006.0463
PMID:17867943
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is associated with decreased morbidity while maintaining similar graft function in short-term follow-up compared with open surgery. We investigated hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) in comparison with standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN) in living donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred patients who received a living-donor kidney and were followed up for more than 1 year were enrolled. The procedure was performed exclusively on the left kidney through either HALDN or ODN from January 2001 to July 2004. The probability of graft survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression hazard model was performed to identify the predictors of graft survival.

RESULTS

The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, warm ischemic time, and operation-related complications were compared. There was no difference in graft function. The cumulative graft survival at 1 and 3 years was similar in the two groups: 98% and 97%. Episodes of acute rejection were an independent predictor of graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donors is safe and effective with results similar to those of open nephrectomy with regard to graft function.

摘要

目的

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜供肾切除术在短期随访中可降低发病率,同时维持相似的移植肾功能。我们对活体供者的手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术(HALDN)与标准开放供肾切除术(ODN)进行了比较研究。

患者与方法

纳入200例接受活体供肾且随访超过1年的患者。2001年1月至2004年7月期间,仅通过HALDN或ODN对左肾进行手术操作。采用Kaplan-Meier法确定移植肾存活概率。使用Cox回归风险模型进行多因素分析,以确定移植肾存活的预测因素。

结果

比较了平均手术时间、估计失血量、热缺血时间和手术相关并发症。移植肾功能无差异。两组1年和3年的累积移植肾存活率相似:分别为98%和97%。急性排斥反应是移植肾存活的独立预测因素。

结论

活体供者手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术安全有效,在移植肾功能方面与开放肾切除术效果相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison of graft survival in live donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic v open procedures.活体供肾肾切除术移植肾存活率的比较:手辅助腹腔镜手术与开放手术
J Endourol. 2007 Aug;21(8):866-71. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0463.
2
Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜手辅助供肾切除术用于活体肾移植后的早期和晚期移植肾功能:与开放性供肾切除术的比较
Urol Int. 2010;84(1):61-6. doi: 10.1159/000273468. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
3
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a single-center experience from South Korea.手辅助腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:来自韩国的单中心经验。
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):58-62. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.58.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication, Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy.后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的安全性和有效性:与手助腹腔镜活体供肾切除术相比,早期并发症、供体和受者结局的比较。
J Endourol. 2018 Dec;32(12):1120-1124. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0669.
5
Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative and functional results in a tertiary care center in Mexico.手辅助腹腔镜与开放供体肾切除术:墨西哥一家三级医疗中心围手术期和功能结果的回顾性比较
Transplant Proc. 2013 Nov;45(9):3220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.055.
6
Hybrid technique using a Satinsky clamp for right-sided transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparison with left-sided standard hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.使用Satinsky钳进行右侧经腹膜后手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术的杂交技术:与左侧标准手辅助腹腔镜技术的比较
Urology. 2014 Dec;84(6):1529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.006.
7
Comparison of donor, and early and late recipient outcomes following hand assisted and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.手助腹腔镜与腹腔镜供肾切取术后供者、早期和晚期受者结局的比较。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.142. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
8
Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:与开放手术技术的比较以及如何达到质量标准:泰国单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2011 Dec;43(10):3593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.115.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x.
10
Right Versus Left Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: A Meta-Analysis.右侧与左侧腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:一项Meta分析
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun;13(3):214-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients.腹腔镜与开放活体供肾肾切除术:266例连续患者的结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1564-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0340-7. Epub 2009 Mar 5.