• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与经腹骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的比较。

Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

作者信息

Hsiao Kenneth C, Latchamsetty Kalyan, Govier Fred E, Kozlowski Paul, Kobashi Kathleen C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2007 Aug;21(8):926-30. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0381.

DOI:10.1089/end.2006.0381
PMID:17867956
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) offers a minimally invasive treatment for vaginal vault prolapse. We describe the surgical technique and offer insight into the learning curve. In addition, we performed a case series review comparing the laparoscopic procedure with its open surgical counterpart with respect to various demographic and perioperative parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Institutional Review Board-approved continence database at our institution was queried to identify all patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy between August 1999 and October 2004. The LSCP was performed in 25 patients, and open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASCP) was performed in 22 patients. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test and the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the demographic characteristics of the patients undergoing the two approaches. The mean estimated blood loss (P = 0.0002) and mean length of hospitalization (P < 0.0001) were significantly less for LSCP, whereas the operative time was significantly longer (219.9 minutes v 185.2 minutes; P = 0.045). The success rate for LSCP at 5.9 months was 100%; the ASCP success rate at 11.0 months was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy led to shorter hospitalization, better hemostasis, and less pain than the open procedure. Early follow-up suggests that LSCP is as effective as ASCP for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(LSCP)为阴道穹窿脱垂提供了一种微创治疗方法。我们描述了该手术技术,并深入探讨了学习曲线。此外,我们进行了一项病例系列回顾,比较了腹腔镜手术与其开放手术对应方式在各种人口统计学和围手术期参数方面的差异。

患者与方法

查询了我们机构经机构审查委员会批准的尿失禁数据库,以确定1999年8月至2004年10月期间所有接受骶骨阴道固定术的患者。25例患者接受了LSCP,22例患者接受了开放腹部骶骨阴道固定术(ASCP)。使用学生t检验和Fisher精确检验分析数据。

结果

接受两种手术方式的患者在人口统计学特征方面未观察到显著差异。LSCP的平均估计失血量(P = 0.0002)和平均住院时间(P < 0.0001)显著更少,而手术时间显著更长(219.9分钟对185.2分钟;P = 0.045)。LSCP在5.9个月时的成功率为100%;ASCP在11.0个月时的成功率为95%。

结论

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术导致住院时间更短、止血效果更好且疼痛更少。早期随访表明,LSCP在治疗阴道穹窿脱垂方面与ASCP一样有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.腹腔镜与经腹骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的比较。
J Endourol. 2007 Aug;21(8):926-30. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0381.
2
Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗重度阴道穹窿脱垂的长期疗效
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.040.
3
Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients treated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Is it a safe procedure for all patients?腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗患者的术前和术后磁共振成像(MRI)结果。对于所有患者来说这都是一种安全的手术吗?
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):316-321. doi: 10.1002/nau.23294. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.与经腹或腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术以及天然组织修复术相比,经阴道网片修补术治疗顶端脱垂后的网片并发症及失败率。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3108-3. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
5
[Abdominal sacrocolpopexy--simple and still actual method in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse?].
Ceska Gynekol. 2008 Jan;73(1):47-53.
6
Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse.机器人辅助腹腔镜在妇科的应用:骶骨阴道固定术治疗重度阴道穹窿脱垂。
Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.022.
7
[Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse].[腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗子宫切除术后阴道穹窿脱垂]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2007 Jul;53(7):467-71.
8
Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.微创骶骨阴道固定术:如何避免短期和长期并发症
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Nov;17(11):81. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0638-7.
9
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂
Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.033.
10
Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy learning curve on operative time, perioperative complications and short term results.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术学习曲线对手术时间、围手术期并发症及短期疗效的影响
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Aug;191:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial for Laparoscopic Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Sacropexy vs. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension.一项关于腹腔镜修复盆腔器官脱垂的多中心随机临床试验的初步结果:骶骨固定术与腹腔镜侧方悬吊术的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2069. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062069.
2
The Learning Curve in Urogynecology and Functional Urology: A Systematic Review.女性盆底重建外科与功能性泌尿外科的学习曲线:一项系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-06016-7.
3
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair: A retrospective cohort study.
腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与开放性腹部骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 May 24;78:103852. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103852. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
A Novel, Structured Fellow Training Pathway for Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.一种新型的机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术规范化培训途径。
Perm J. 2021 May 26;25:20.224. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.224.
5
Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a minimum of three years follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的长期结局:至少三年随访结果
J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):175-80. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0244-0. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
6
Robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site utero-sacral ligament suspension for apical vaginal prolapse: evaluation of our technique and perioperative outcomes.机器人辅助及腹腔镜单孔子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗阴道顶端脱垂:我们的技术及围手术期结果评估
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):171-177. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0638-0. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
The investigation and treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction.女性盆底功能障碍的调查与治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Aug 17;112(33-34):564-74. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0564.
8
Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术的中期结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2688-7. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Pain medication requirements after sacropexy and combination interventions.骶骨固定术及联合干预后的止痛药物需求
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00036.
10
Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery is superior to vaginal reconstruction in the pelvic organ prolapse.在盆腔器官脱垂方面,腹腔镜重建手术优于阴道重建手术。
Int J Med Sci. 2014 Aug 10;11(11):1082-8. doi: 10.7150/ijms.9027. eCollection 2014.