Suppr超能文献

直肠癌术前放化疗:口服尿嘧啶替加氟和口服亚叶酸与静脉注射5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸对比的随机试验

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: randomized trial comparing oral uracil and tegafur and oral leucovorin vs. intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin.

作者信息

de la Torre Alejandro, García-Berrocal Maria Isabel, Arias Fernando, Mariño Alfonso, Valcárcel Francisco, Magallón Rosa, Regueiro Carlos A, Romero Jesús, Zapata Irma, de la Fuente Cristina, Fernández-Lizarbe Eva, Vergara Gloria, Belinchón Belén, Veiras Maria, Molerón Rafael, Millán Isabel

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.068. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare, in a randomized trial, 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) (FU+LV) vs. oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus LV (UFT+LV) given concomitantly with preoperative irradiation in patients with cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 155 patients were entered onto the trial. Patients received pelvic radiotherapy (4500-5,040 cGy in 5 to 6 weeks) and chemotherapy consisting of two 5-day courses of 20 mg/m(2)/d LV and 350 mg/m(2)/d FU in the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy (77 patients) or one course of 25 mg/d oral LV and 300 mg/m(2)/d UFT for 4 weeks beginning in the second week of radiotherapy (78 patients). The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and resectability rate. Secondary endpoints included downstaging rate, toxicity, and survival.

RESULTS

Grade 3-5 acute hematologic toxicity occurred only with FU+LV (leukopenia 9%; p = 0.02). There were no differences in resectability rates (92.1% vs. 93.4%; p = 0.82). The pCR rate was 13.2% in both arms. Tumor downstaging was more frequent with UFT+LV (59.2% vs. 43.3%; p = 0.04). Three-year overall survival was 87% with FU+LV and 74% with UFT+LV (p = 0.37). The 3-year cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 7.5% and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.619; relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval 0.32-6.55).

CONCLUSION

Although this study lacked statistical power to exclude clinically significant differences between both groups, the outcome of patients treated with UFT+LV did not differ significantly from that of patients treated with FU+LV, and hematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the experimental arm.

摘要

目的

在一项随机试验中,比较5-氟尿嘧啶(FU)加亚叶酸钙(LV)(FU+LV)与口服替加氟尿嘧啶(UFT)加LV(UFT+LV)同步术前放疗用于cT3-4期或N+期直肠癌患者的疗效。

方法与材料

共有155例患者进入该试验。患者接受盆腔放疗(5至6周内4500 - 5040 cGy),化疗方案为:放疗第1周和第5周,给予两个疗程,每个疗程5天,LV 20 mg/m²/d,FU 350 mg/m²/d(77例患者);或放疗第2周开始,给予一个疗程,共4周,口服LV 25 mg/d,UFT 300 mg/m²/d(78例患者)。主要终点为病理完全缓解(pCR)率和可切除率。次要终点包括降期率、毒性和生存率。

结果

3 - 5级急性血液学毒性仅在FU+LV组出现(白细胞减少9%;p = 0.02)。两组的可切除率无差异(92.1%对93.4%;p = 0.82)。两组的pCR率均为13.2%。UFT+LV组肿瘤降期更常见(59.2%对43.3%;p = 0.04)。FU+LV组3年总生存率为87%,UFT+LV组为74%(p = 0.37)。两组3年局部复发累积发生率分别为7.5%和8.9%(p = 0.619;相对风险1.46;95%置信区间0.32 - 6.55)。

结论

尽管本研究缺乏统计学效力以排除两组间的临床显著差异,但UFT+LV组患者与FU+LV组患者的结局无显著差异,且试验组血液学毒性显著更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验