de la Torre Alejandro, García-Berrocal Maria Isabel, Arias Fernando, Mariño Alfonso, Valcárcel Francisco, Magallón Rosa, Regueiro Carlos A, Romero Jesús, Zapata Irma, de la Fuente Cristina, Fernández-Lizarbe Eva, Vergara Gloria, Belinchón Belén, Veiras Maria, Molerón Rafael, Millán Isabel
Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.068. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
To compare, in a randomized trial, 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) (FU+LV) vs. oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus LV (UFT+LV) given concomitantly with preoperative irradiation in patients with cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer.
A total of 155 patients were entered onto the trial. Patients received pelvic radiotherapy (4500-5,040 cGy in 5 to 6 weeks) and chemotherapy consisting of two 5-day courses of 20 mg/m(2)/d LV and 350 mg/m(2)/d FU in the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy (77 patients) or one course of 25 mg/d oral LV and 300 mg/m(2)/d UFT for 4 weeks beginning in the second week of radiotherapy (78 patients). The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and resectability rate. Secondary endpoints included downstaging rate, toxicity, and survival.
Grade 3-5 acute hematologic toxicity occurred only with FU+LV (leukopenia 9%; p = 0.02). There were no differences in resectability rates (92.1% vs. 93.4%; p = 0.82). The pCR rate was 13.2% in both arms. Tumor downstaging was more frequent with UFT+LV (59.2% vs. 43.3%; p = 0.04). Three-year overall survival was 87% with FU+LV and 74% with UFT+LV (p = 0.37). The 3-year cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 7.5% and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.619; relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval 0.32-6.55).
Although this study lacked statistical power to exclude clinically significant differences between both groups, the outcome of patients treated with UFT+LV did not differ significantly from that of patients treated with FU+LV, and hematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the experimental arm.
在一项随机试验中,比较5-氟尿嘧啶(FU)加亚叶酸钙(LV)(FU+LV)与口服替加氟尿嘧啶(UFT)加LV(UFT+LV)同步术前放疗用于cT3-4期或N+期直肠癌患者的疗效。
共有155例患者进入该试验。患者接受盆腔放疗(5至6周内4500 - 5040 cGy),化疗方案为:放疗第1周和第5周,给予两个疗程,每个疗程5天,LV 20 mg/m²/d,FU 350 mg/m²/d(77例患者);或放疗第2周开始,给予一个疗程,共4周,口服LV 25 mg/d,UFT 300 mg/m²/d(78例患者)。主要终点为病理完全缓解(pCR)率和可切除率。次要终点包括降期率、毒性和生存率。
3 - 5级急性血液学毒性仅在FU+LV组出现(白细胞减少9%;p = 0.02)。两组的可切除率无差异(92.1%对93.4%;p = 0.82)。两组的pCR率均为13.2%。UFT+LV组肿瘤降期更常见(59.2%对43.3%;p = 0.04)。FU+LV组3年总生存率为87%,UFT+LV组为74%(p = 0.37)。两组3年局部复发累积发生率分别为7.5%和8.9%(p = 0.619;相对风险1.46;95%置信区间0.32 - 6.55)。
尽管本研究缺乏统计学效力以排除两组间的临床显著差异,但UFT+LV组患者与FU+LV组患者的结局无显著差异,且试验组血液学毒性显著更低。