Khoja Shariq, McGregor S Elizabeth, Hilsden Robert J
Department of Community Health Sciences at the Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan.
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jul;53(7):1192-7.
This study aims to determine the validity of self-reported history of colorectal cancer (CRC) testing consisting of fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs)in the past 2 years or endoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) in the past 5 years by comparing it with reports provided by physicians.
A cross-sectional design was used for this study.
Study participants were selected directly from the city's population. Self-reported history of CRC testing was validated using records obtained from their physicians' offices.
Participants were adults of 50 to 74 years, living within the boundaries of Calgary Health Region in Alberta.
Participants were recruited by a random-digit dial telephone survey of adults aged 50 to 74 years (n = 598). Following a phased process, a subset of these people (n = 200) agreed to provide names of their physicians to be contacted for their histories of CRC testing. Physicians' reports were used to measure validity of self-reported history.
Agreement between self-reported history and physician's records was measured using kappa statistics and concordance. Validity of self-report was measured by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. Reasons for testing reported by the participants were compared with those reported by their physicians.
Complete information was received for 146 participants, revealing a 34.2% testing rate for CRC. Intermediate level of agreement for testing history (kappa = 0.66 and concordance = 84.9%) was found between the 2 types of reporting for CRC testing. Self-reported history showed sensitivity of 76.0% (95% CI = 61.8%-86.9%) and specificity of 89.6% (95% CI = 81.7%-94.9%). High specificity was also observed for self-reporting of the individual tests, but low sensitivity was seen for the reporting of FOBT in the last 2 years. Most participants who correctly recalled the testing history also accurately identified the reason for testing (concordance = 80.0% for FOBT and 69.6% for endoscopy).
Self-reported history of CRC testing and physicians' reports showed dependable agreement. Physicians need to probe their patients further for the history of FOBT. These results can be useful in clinical practice to determine the CRC screening status of the patients.
本研究旨在通过将过去2年粪便潜血试验(FOBT)或过去5年内镜检查(乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查)的结直肠癌(CRC)检测自我报告病史与医生提供的报告进行比较,来确定其有效性。
本研究采用横断面设计。
研究参与者直接从该市人口中选取。使用从其医生办公室获得的记录来验证CRC检测的自我报告病史。
参与者为年龄在50至74岁之间、居住在艾伯塔省卡尔加里健康区域范围内的成年人。
通过对50至74岁成年人进行随机数字拨号电话调查招募参与者(n = 598)。经过分阶段过程,这些人中的一部分(n = 200)同意提供其医生的姓名,以便联系获取他们的CRC检测病史。医生的报告用于衡量自我报告病史的有效性。
使用kappa统计量和一致性来衡量自我报告病史与医生记录之间的一致性。通过计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来衡量自我报告的有效性。将参与者报告的检测原因与其医生报告的原因进行比较。
收到了146名参与者的完整信息,显示CRC检测率为34.2%。在两种类型的CRC检测报告之间发现检测病史的一致性处于中等水平(kappa = 0.66,一致性 = 84.9%)。自我报告病史的敏感性为76.0%(95%可信区间 = 61.8% - 86.9%),特异性为89.6%(95%可信区间 = 81.7% - 94.9%)。对于个体检测的自我报告也观察到高特异性,但过去2年FOBT报告的敏感性较低。大多数正确回忆检测病史的参与者也准确识别了检测原因(FOBT的一致性为80.0%,内镜检查为69.6%)。
CRC检测的自我报告病史与医生报告显示出可靠的一致性。医生需要进一步询问患者FOBT病史。这些结果在临床实践中有助于确定患者的CRC筛查状态。