Suppr超能文献

遗传性结直肠癌筛查:一项教育干预后的10年纵向队列研究。

Hereditary colorectal cancer screening: A 10-year longitudinal cohort study following an educational intervention.

作者信息

Carroll June C, Permaul Joanne A, Semotiuk Kara, Yung Eric M, Blaine Sean, Dicks Elizabeth, Warner Ellen, Rothenmund Heidi, Esplen Mary Jane, Moineddin Rahim, McLaughlin John

机构信息

Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 23;20:101189. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101189. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Family history (FH) of a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with two to fourfold increased risk, yet screening uptake is suboptimal despite proven mortality reduction. We developed a FH-based CRC Risk Triage/Management tool for family physicians (FPs), and educational booklet for patients with CRC FH. This report describes physician referral and patient screening behavior 5 and 10 years post-educational intervention, and factors associated with screening. Longitudinal cohort study. FPs/patients in Ontario and Newfoundland, Canada were sent questionnaires at baseline (2005), 5 and 10 years (2015) following tool/booklet receipt. FPs were asked about CRC screening, patients about FH, screening type and timing. "Correct" screening was concordance with tool recommendations. Results reported for 29/121 (24%) FPs and 98/297 (33%) patients who completed all 3 questionnaires. Over 10 years 2/3 patients received the correct CRC screening test at appropriate timing (baseline 75%, 5-year 62%, 10-year 65%). About half reported their FP recommended CRC screening (5-year 51%, 10-year 63%). Fewer than half the patients correctly assessed their CRC risk (44%, 40%, 41%). Patients were less likely to have correct screening timing if female (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61, 0.99; p = 0.045). Patients were less likely to have both correct test and timing if moderate/high CRC risk (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47, 0.93; p = 0.017) and more likely if their physician recommended screening (RR1.69; 95% CI 1.15, 2.49; p = 0.007). Physician discussion of CRC risk and screening can positively impact patient screening behavior. Efforts are particularly needed for women and patients at moderate/high CRC risk.

摘要

一级亲属患有结直肠癌(CRC)的家族史会使患病风险增加两到四倍,然而,尽管已证实筛查可降低死亡率,但筛查的接受率仍不理想。我们为家庭医生(FPs)开发了一种基于家族史的CRC风险分类/管理工具,并为有CRC家族史的患者编写了教育手册。本报告描述了教育干预后5年和10年医生的转诊情况以及患者的筛查行为,以及与筛查相关的因素。纵向队列研究。向加拿大安大略省和纽芬兰的家庭医生/患者在基线时(2005年)、收到工具/手册后的5年和10年(2015年)发送问卷。询问家庭医生有关CRC筛查的情况,询问患者有关家族史、筛查类型和时间的情况。“正确”的筛查是指与工具建议一致。报告了完成所有3份问卷的29/121名(24%)家庭医生和98/297名(33%)患者的结果。在10年期间,2/3的患者在适当的时间接受了正确的CRC筛查测试(基线时75%,5年时62%,10年时65%)。约一半的患者报告其家庭医生建议进行CRC筛查(5年时51%,10年时63%)。不到一半的患者正确评估了自己的CRC风险(44%、40%、41%)。女性患者进行正确筛查的时间可能性较小(相对风险0.78;95%置信区间0.61,0.99;p = 0.045)。CRC风险为中度/高度时,如果测试和时间都正确,则可能性较小(相对风险0.66;95%置信区间0.47,0.93;p = 0.017),而如果其医生建议进行筛查,则可能性较大(相对风险1.69;95%置信区间1.15,2.49;p = 0.007)。医生对CRC风险和筛查的讨论可以对患者的筛查行为产生积极影响。对于女性以及CRC风险为中度/高度的患者,尤其需要做出努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14c7/7581973/f59bcbbb796a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验