• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双股隧道后交叉韧带重建中劈开堆叠同种异体移植物与跟腱劈开同种异体移植物的比较。

Comparison of the split stacked versus the split achilles allograft for dual femoral tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

作者信息

DeBerardino Thomas M, Lonergan Keith T, Brooks Daniel E

机构信息

Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, NY 10996, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):142-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307393. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/0363546507307393
PMID:17873155
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cadaveric testing has shown that double-bundle reconstruction better replicates the native anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament. With the current trend toward allograft Achilles posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, the need to determine a graft configuration with the highest tensile and pull-out strength has become paramount.

HYPOTHESIS

The split stacked Achilles allograft construct provides greater graft material to traverse the notch and provides increased load to failure at the tibial point of fixation compared with a standard monoblock Achilles allograft construct.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight matched pairs of Achilles allograft tendons were secured to 8 matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae. Group 1 consisted of single-block grafts (n = 8), and group 2 included the split stacked grafts (n = 8). The cross-sectional area of each graft's 2 collagenous bundles was measured with a micrometer. The graft constructs were pulled to ultimate failure at a rate of 50 mm/min on a materials testing machine.

RESULTS

The mean cross-sectional area of the group 2 split stacked grafts (76.6 +/- 3.1 mm(2)) was significantly greater than that of the group 1 single-block grafts (48.2 +/- 3.0 mm(2); P =.00006). The maximum load to failure of the group 2 construct was significantly greater (1383 +/- 102 N) than that of the group 1 single-block configuration (1020 +/- 136 N; P =.01).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the novel split stacked configuration of an Achilles tendon allograft provides a greater cross-sectional area of graft material across the joint as well as a significant increase in the overall load to failure strength compared with a standard monoblock Achilles allograft construct.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The split stacked Achilles graft is an efficient method for using the entire allograft. With maintenance and use of all collagen fibers, the split stacked Achilles construct provides essentially 2 grafts in 1 while only using a single tibial tunnel.

摘要

背景

尸体研究表明,双束重建能更好地复制后交叉韧带的原始解剖结构。随着目前同种异体跟腱后交叉韧带重建的趋势,确定具有最高拉伸和拔出强度的移植物构型的需求变得至关重要。

假设

与标准整块同种异体跟腱移植物构型相比,劈开堆叠的同种异体跟腱移植物构建体能提供更多的移植物材料穿过切口,并在胫骨固定点增加至失效的负荷。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

将八对匹配的同种异体跟腱固定到八对新鲜冷冻的人体尸体胫骨上。第1组由整块移植物组成(n = 8),第2组包括劈开堆叠移植物(n = 8)。用测微计测量每个移植物的两条胶原束的横截面积。在材料试验机上以50毫米/分钟的速度将移植物构建体拉至最终失效。

结果

第2组劈开堆叠移植物的平均横截面积(76.6±3.1平方毫米)显著大于第1组整块移植物的平均横截面积(48.2±3.0平方毫米;P = 0.00006)。第2组构建体的最大失效负荷(1383±102牛)显著大于第1组整块构型的最大失效负荷(1020±136牛;P = 0.0

相似文献

1
Comparison of the split stacked versus the split achilles allograft for dual femoral tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.双股隧道后交叉韧带重建中劈开堆叠同种异体移植物与跟腱劈开同种异体移植物的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):142-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307393. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
An anatomical and biomechanical comparison of anteromedial and anterolateral approaches for tibial tunnel of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the widening effect of the anterolateral approach.前内侧和前外侧入路重建后交叉韧带胫骨隧道的解剖和生物力学比较:前外侧入路的扩宽效果评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):1777-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546509332508. Epub 2009 May 26.
3
[An experimental study of split-double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in single femoral tunnel].单股骨隧道内双束后交叉韧带重建的实验研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;21(8):820-4.
4
Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.单纯后交叉韧带重建中胫骨镶嵌与经胫骨技术的比较:至少2年随访
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.057.
5
Tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament allograft tendons: comparison of 1-, 2-, and 4-stranded constructs.前交叉韧带同种异体肌腱的胫骨固定:单股、双股和四股结构的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):1531-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546509332504. Epub 2009 May 21.
6
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft--clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up.后交叉韧带重建:双股绳肌腱自体移植与跟腱异体移植——至少2年随访的临床结果
Arthroscopy. 2005 Aug;21(8):965-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.004.
7
[Arthroscopic simultaneous reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament using double femoral tunnel technique and anterior cruciate ligament with achilles allograft].[关节镜下采用双股骨隧道技术同期重建后交叉韧带及跟腱异体移植重建前交叉韧带]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):94-7.
8
Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament using tibial-inlay and double-bundle technique.关节镜下采用胫骨嵌体和双束技术重建后交叉韧带
Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10):1271. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.004.
9
Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.后交叉韧带重建中模拟关节镜下与开放嵌体技术胫骨移植物固定的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1731-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546507302216. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
10
Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.后交叉韧带重建术中初始胫骨固定的生物力学
Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10):1164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Sectional Area Measurement Techniques of Soft Tissue: A Literature Review.软组织横截面积测量技术:文献综述。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):1547-1566. doi: 10.1111/os.12757. Epub 2020 Sep 15.