Suppr超能文献

小梁切除术滤过泡针刺修复术后的白内障手术

Cataract surgery after needling revision of trabeculectomy blebs.

作者信息

Rotchford Alan P, King Anthony J W

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2007 Sep;16(6):562-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180575255.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of cataract surgery on trabeculectomy blebs that have previously had successful needling revision.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective controlled study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of patients undergoing needling of a poorly functioning trabeculectomy bleb was collected. From this cohort a group having had a successful needling outcome who subsequently underwent uneventful phacoemulsification was identified. Each member of this phacoemulsification group was matched with 2 controls from the cohort who had also had success from needling but who had not undergone cataract surgery. Survival analysis was performed using the date of cataract surgery as the entry time for the phacoemulsification group. For controls the entry time was the date of needling adjusted by subtracting the time between needling and cataract surgery of the matched phacoemulsification group subject. In this way an identical period had elapsed between needling and entry time for both phacoemulsification group and controls. Survival depended on (a) intraocular pressure (IOP) < or =21 mm Hg and (b) IOP <80% of preneedling IOP, on the same or fewer glaucoma drops and without further glaucoma surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included. Intervals from trabeculectomy to needling, needling to phacoemulsification, and from phacoemulsification to final follow-up ranged from 1 to 320, 4 to 15, and 5 to 19 months, respectively. Mean survival for the phacoemulsification group was 34.4 weeks and 190.0 for controls [hazard ratio 8.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.8-23.9) (log rank P<0.0001)]. Survival at final follow-up was 4/15 and 25/30 for cases and controls, respectively (chi2 P=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Previously successful bleb needling can be significantly compromised by subsequent cataract surgery.

摘要

目的

评估白内障手术对先前经针刺修复成功的小梁切除术滤过泡的影响。

研究设计

一项回顾性对照研究。

患者和方法

收集一组接受针刺治疗功能不佳的小梁切除术滤过泡的患者。从该队列中确定一组针刺治疗成功且随后顺利接受超声乳化白内障吸除术的患者。该超声乳化白内障吸除术组的每名成员与队列中另外2名同样针刺治疗成功但未接受白内障手术的对照者匹配。生存分析以白内障手术日期作为超声乳化白内障吸除术组的进入时间进行。对于对照者,进入时间是通过减去匹配的超声乳化白内障吸除术组受试者针刺与白内障手术之间的时间来调整的针刺日期。通过这种方式,超声乳化白内障吸除术组和对照者在针刺与进入时间之间经过了相同的时间段。生存取决于:(a)眼压(IOP)≤21 mmHg,以及(b)眼压<针刺前眼压的80%,使用相同或更少的青光眼药物且无需进一步的青光眼手术。

结果

纳入45例患者。从小梁切除术到针刺、针刺到超声乳化白内障吸除术以及从超声乳化白内障吸除术到最终随访的时间间隔分别为1至320个月、4至15个月和5至19个月。超声乳化白内障吸除术组的平均生存期为34.4周,对照组为190.0周[风险比8.1(95%置信区间:2.8 - 23.9)(对数秩检验P<0.0001)]。在最终随访时,病例组和对照组的生存率分别为4/15和25/30(卡方检验P = 0.0002)。

结论

先前成功的滤过泡针刺可能会因随后的白内障手术而受到显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验