Suppr超能文献

丝裂霉素C和5-氟尿嘧啶用于小梁切除术滤过泡针刺修复的长期疗效:安全性和有效性比较报告

Long-term outcomes of needle revision of trabeculectomy blebs with mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: a comparative safety and efficacy report.

作者信息

Anand Nitin, Khan Aldrin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2009 Sep;18(7):513-20. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181911271.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To report the long-term comparative outcomes for needle revision with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) of failed trabeculectomy blebs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective database search was made for all patients who had needle revision with subconjunctival antimetabolite injections on the slit lamp from August 2001 to April 2006. Needle revisions were augmented with MMC instead of 5-FU from December 2003. Ninety-eight eyes of 95 consecutive patients (45 with MMC and 53 with 5-FU) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. 5-FU (5 mg) or MMC (0.02 mg), with 0.1 mL of 2% lignocaine was injected subconjunctivally at least 10 minutes before the revision procedure in the clinic. No patient from the MMC group received subsequent 5-FU injections.

RESULTS

The 5-FU group had significantly longer mean follow-ups (P<0.001) of 53.0+/-18.12 months compared with 33.3+/-9.0 months in the MMC group. The 5-FU group had a significantly higher number of needle revisions than MMC group (1.9+/-1.0 vs. 1.2+/-0.5, P=0.001). Twenty-five eyes (47%) of the 5-FU group and 36 eyes (80%) of the MMC group had a single needle revision (P=0.009). The probability of maintaining intraocular pressure between 5 and 16 mm Hg with no glaucoma medication or further surgical procedure was 71% (62%-88%) and 45% (33%-60%) at 1 year and 61% (49%-78%) and 30% (20%-46%) at 2 years in the MMC and 5-FU groups, respectively. MMC use (hazard ratio=2.18, 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.81, P=0.006) and intraocular pressure drop immediately after needling as a continuous variable (hazard ratio=1.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.13.8, P=0.03) were significantly associated with success. Twelve eyes (22.6%) with failed 5-FU needling had subsequent MMC needle revisions, 5 of which were successful by the study criterion. Eyes with 5-FU needle revision were more likely to fail within the first 6 months (P=0.02). Serious complications included blebitis in 3 (5.7%) and 1 (2.2%), delayed bleb leaks in 9 (17.0%) and 1 (2.2%) eyes in the 5-FU and MMC groups, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the groups. Aqueous misdirection was observed in 1 (2.2%) eye of MMC group and delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage in 1 (1.9%) eye of 5-FU group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that MMC is more effective than 5-FU for needle revision of failed trabeculectomy blebs.

摘要

目的

报告小梁切除术滤过泡失败后使用5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)和丝裂霉素C(MMC)进行针拨修复的长期对比结果。

患者和方法

对2001年8月至2006年4月在裂隙灯下接受结膜下抗代谢药物注射针拨修复的所有患者进行回顾性数据库检索。从2003年12月起,针拨修复改用MMC而非5-FU。纳入95例连续患者的98只眼(45例使用MMC,53例使用5-FU),最小随访时间为1年。在临床修复手术前至少10分钟,将5-FU(5毫克)或MMC(0.02毫克)与0.1毫升2%利多卡因结膜下注射。MMC组无患者接受后续5-FU注射。

结果

5-FU组的平均随访时间显著更长(P<0.001),为53.0±18.12个月,而MMC组为33.3±9.0个月。5-FU组的针拨修复次数显著多于MMC组(1.9±1.0比1.2±0.5,P=0.001)。5-FU组25只眼(47%)和MMC组36只眼(80%)进行了单次针拨修复(P=0.009)。MMC组和5-FU组在1年时眼压维持在5至16毫米汞柱且无需青光眼药物治疗或进一步手术的概率分别为71%(62%-88%)和45%(33%-60%),在2年时分别为61%(49%-78%)和30%(20%-46%)。使用MMC(风险比=2.18,95%置信区间,1.25-3.81,P=0.006)以及针拨后眼压下降作为连续变量(风险比=1.06,95%置信区间,1.00-1.13.8,P=0.03)与成功显著相关。5-FU针拨修复失败的12只眼(22.6%)随后进行了MMC针拨修复,其中5只按研究标准成功。5-FU针拨修复的眼在最初6个月内更易失败(P=0.02)。严重并发症包括5-FU组3只眼(5.7%)和MMC组1只眼(2.2%)发生睑缘炎,5-FU组9只眼(17.0%)和MMC组1只眼(2.2%)发生延迟性滤过泡渗漏。两组并发症发生率无统计学差异。MMC组1只眼(2.2%)观察到房水错流,5-FU组1只眼(1.9%)发生延迟性脉络膜上腔出血。

结论

本研究表明,对于小梁切除术滤过泡失败的针拨修复,MMC比5-FU更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验