Amin A A, Kokwaro G O
Centre for Geographic Medicine Research-Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007 Oct;32(5):429-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2007.00847.x.
There are several reports of sub-standard and counterfeit antimalarial drugs circulating in the markets of developing countries; we aimed to review the literature for the African continent.
A search was conducted in PubMed in English using the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: 'Antimalarials/analysis'[MeSH] OR 'Antimalarials/standards'[MeSH] AND 'Africa'[MeSH]' to include articles published up to and including 26 February 2007. Data were augmented with reports on the quality of antimalarial drugs in Africa obtained from colleagues in the World Health Organization. We summarized the data under the following themes: content and dissolution; relative bioavailability of antimalarial products; antimalarial stability and shelf life; general tests on pharmaceutical dosage forms; and the presence of degradation or unidentifiable impurities in formulations.
The search yielded 21 relevant peer-reviewed articles and three reports on the quality of antimalarial drugs in Africa. The literature was varied in the quality and breadth of data presented, with most bioavailability studies poorly designed and executed. The review highlights the common finding in drug quality studies that (i) most antimalarial products pass the basic tests for pharmaceutical dosage forms, such as the uniformity of weight for tablets, (ii) most antimalarial drugs pass the content test and (iii) in vitro product dissolution is the main problem area where most drugs fail to meet required pharmacopoeial specifications, especially with regard to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine products. In addition, there are worryingly high quality failure rates for artemisinin monotherapies such as dihydroartemisinin (DHA); for instance all five DHA sampled products in one study in Nairobi, Kenya, were reported to have failed the requisite tests.
There is an urgent need to strengthen pharmaceutical management systems such as post-marketing surveillance and the broader health systems in Africa to ensure populations in the continent have access to antimalarial drugs that are safe, of the highest quality standards and that retain their integrity throughout the distribution chain through adequate enforcement of existing legislation and enactment of new ones if necessary, and provision of the necessary resources for drug quality assurance.
有几份报告指出,发展中国家市场上存在不合标准及假冒的抗疟药物;我们旨在对非洲大陆的相关文献进行综述。
在PubMed中使用医学主题词(MeSH)检索英文文献,检索词为:“抗疟药/分析”[MeSH] 或 “抗疟药/标准”[MeSH] 以及 “非洲”[MeSH],以纳入截至2007年2月26日(含该日)发表的文章。通过世界卫生组织的同事提供的有关非洲抗疟药物质量的报告对数据进行补充。我们按照以下主题对数据进行了总结:含量与溶出度;抗疟产品的相对生物利用度;抗疟药物的稳定性与保质期;药物剂型的一般检测;以及制剂中降解产物或无法识别的杂质的存在情况。
检索得到21篇相关的同行评审文章以及3份关于非洲抗疟药物质量的报告。所呈现的数据在质量和广度上各不相同,大多数生物利用度研究的设计和实施都很差。该综述突出了药物质量研究中的常见发现,即:(i)大多数抗疟产品通过了药物剂型的基本检测,如片剂重量均匀度检测;(ii)大多数抗疟药物通过了含量检测;(iii)体外产品溶出度是主要问题领域,大多数药物未能达到所需的药典标准,尤其是磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶产品。此外,青蒿素单一疗法如双氢青蒿素(DHA)的质量不合格率高得令人担忧;例如,在肯尼亚内罗毕的一项研究中,所抽样的5种DHA产品均被报告未通过必要检测。
迫切需要加强非洲的药品管理系统,如上市后监测以及更广泛的卫生系统,以确保非洲大陆的民众能够获得安全、质量最高标准且在整个分销链中保持完整性的抗疟药物,这需要通过充分执行现有法规并在必要时颁布新法规,以及提供药物质量保证所需的必要资源来实现。