Suppr超能文献

骨密度和骨几何形态在评估绝经后女性髋部骨折风险中的应用

Bone density and geometry in assessing hip fracture risk in post-menopausal women.

作者信息

Gnudi S, Sitta E, Fiumi N

机构信息

Modulo Dipartimentale di Medicina Interna, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2007 Nov;80(959):893-7. doi: 10.1259/bjr/37401526. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

Abstract

We used femoral neck structural parameters (FNSPs), calculated from bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the femoral neck by dual X-ray absorptiometry, to discriminate osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur in post-menopausal women. We compared 1646 women without fracture and 429 women with hip fractures, including 273 with femoral neck (FN) and 156 with trochanter (TR) fractures. The association between the studied parameters and the fractures was modelled using multiple logistic regression, and included age, height and weight. Fracture-predicted probability (FPP) was also calculated for each predictor tested. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas with their standard errors (SEs) were calculated for the fracture status, having the calculated FPP as a test variable. The areas were compared by the Hanley-McNeil test. Hip fracture had lower BMD, cross-sectional area (CSA), section modulus (SM) and cortical thickness (CT), and higher buckling ratio (BR), than controls. To the same extent as FN BMD, BR best predicted the risk for each fracture, showing ROC curve areas of 0.809 (SE 0.011) for hip fracture, 0.789 (SE 0.014) for FN fracture, and 0.848 (SE 0.016) for TR fracture. The association of BR with fracture risk did not differ from that of FN BMD, which has a ROC curve area of 0.801 (SE 0.011) for hip fracture, 0.778 (SE 0.014) for FN fracture, and 0.852 (SE 0.016) for TR fracture. Both FN BMD and BR predicted TR fracture significantly better than they did FN fracture. FNSPs, although interesting in understanding the biomechanics of bone fragility, do not appear to add diagnostic value to the simple measurement of BMD.

摘要

我们使用通过双能X线吸收法测量股骨颈骨密度(BMD)计算得出的股骨颈结构参数(FNSPs),来鉴别绝经后女性股骨近端的骨质疏松性骨折。我们比较了1646名未发生骨折的女性和429名发生髋部骨折的女性,其中包括273名股骨颈(FN)骨折患者和156名转子(TR)骨折患者。使用多元逻辑回归对研究参数与骨折之间的关联进行建模,模型纳入了年龄、身高和体重。还针对每个测试的预测因子计算了骨折预测概率(FPP)。以计算得出的FPP作为测试变量,计算骨折状态的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线面积及其标准误差(SEs)。通过Hanley-McNeil检验对这些面积进行比较。与对照组相比,髋部骨折患者的BMD、横截面积(CSA)、截面模量(SM)和皮质厚度(CT)较低,而屈曲比(BR)较高。与FN BMD在相同程度上,BR最能预测每种骨折的风险,髋部骨折的ROC曲线面积为0.809(SE 0.011),FN骨折为0.789(SE 0.014),TR骨折为0.848(SE 0.016)。BR与骨折风险的关联与FN BMD的关联无差异,髋部骨折的FN BMD的ROC曲线面积为0.801(SE 0.011),FN骨折为0.778(SE 0.014),TR骨折为0.852(SE 0.016)。FN BMD和BR对TR骨折的预测均明显优于对FN骨折的预测。FNSPs虽然在理解骨脆性的生物力学方面很有趣,但似乎并未为简单的BMD测量增加诊断价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验