Zhuang Huafeng, Li Yizhong, Lin Jinkuang, Cai Donglu, Cai Siqing, Yan Lisheng, Yao Xuedong
Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362000, China.
Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362000, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1669-z.
This study assessed the differences in femoral geometry and bone mineral density between femoral neck fragility fractures and trochanteric fractures.
One hundred and seventeen patients were divided into femoral neck and trochanteric fracture groups. There were 69 patients with femoral neck fractures, 20 men and 49 women with an average age of 75.1 ± 9.6 years and an average body mass index (BMI) value of 21.6 ± 4.1 kg/m. The trochanteric group consisted of 48 patients, 16 men and 32 women with an average age of 78.1 ± 9.1 years and an average BMI value of 21.5 ± 4.3 kg/m. All patients underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the contralateral hip; hip structural analysis (HSA) software was used to analyze the femoral geometry parameters, including hip axis length (HAL), neck-shaft angle (NSA), cross-sectional area (CSA), the cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), the buckling ratio (BR), and cortical thickness.
The cortical thickness in the intertrochanteric region was reduced in the trochanteric fractures group compared to the femoral neck fracture group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in gender, age, height, weight, or BMI between the two groups. In addition, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were found in the CSA, CSMI, or BR of the femoral neck or the intertrochanteric region between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in femoral neck cortical thickness between the two groups.
Cortical thickness thinning in the intertrochanteric region may be one of the relevant factors causing different types of hip fractures, especially in elderly patients.
本研究评估了股骨颈脆性骨折和转子间骨折在股骨几何形状和骨密度方面的差异。
117例患者被分为股骨颈骨折组和转子间骨折组。股骨颈骨折组有69例患者,其中男性20例,女性49例,平均年龄75.1±9.6岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为21.6±4.1kg/m²。转子间骨折组由48例患者组成,其中男性16例,女性32例,平均年龄78.1±9.1岁,平均BMI值为21.5±4.3kg/m²。所有患者均接受对侧髋关节的双能X线吸收法(DXA)检查;使用髋关节结构分析(HSA)软件分析股骨几何参数,包括髋轴长度(HAL)、颈干角(NSA)、横截面积(CSA)、截面惯性矩(CSMI)、屈曲比(BR)和皮质厚度。
与股骨颈骨折组相比,转子间骨折组转子间区域的皮质厚度降低(P<0.05)。两组在性别、年龄、身高、体重或BMI方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,两组之间股骨颈或转子间区域的CSA、CSMI或BR也无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。两组之间股骨颈皮质厚度无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。
转子间区域的皮质厚度变薄可能是导致不同类型髋部骨折的相关因素之一,尤其是在老年患者中。