Hartmann Mateus Silveira Martins, Barletta Fernando Branco, Camargo Fontanella Vânia Regina, Vanni José Roberto
Lutheran University of Brazil, Department of Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Canoas, RS, Brazil.
J Endod. 2007 Aug;33(8):962-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.019. Epub 2007 May 3.
This in vitro study used computed tomography (CT) to compare the occurrence of canal transportation in the apical third of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars instrumented with 3 techniques. Sixty teeth were assigned to 3 groups (n = 20), and the root canals were instrumented as follows: Group 1, hand instrumentation with K-files; Group 2, K-files coupled to an oscillatory system powered by an electric engine; Group 3, ProTaper NiTi rotary system powered by an electric engine. To compare the canal transportation produced by the different techniques, preinstrumentation and postinstrumentation 3-dimensional CT images were obtained from root cross-sections of the region located 3 mm short of the apical foramen of each root canal. The CT scans were exported to Adobe Photoshop software, and the initial and final images were superimposed to detect the root canal wall differences between them. Canal transportation was measured by the distance between the prepared canal center and the anatomic canal center. The manual technique produced lesser canal transportation (0.10 mm) than the oscillatory and rotary techniques (0.37 and 0.22 mm, respectively); this difference was statistically significant (P=.021). All studied techniques produced canal transportation.
这项体外研究使用计算机断层扫描(CT)来比较用3种技术对上颌磨牙近中颊根管根尖三分之一进行预备时根管偏移的发生率。60颗牙齿被分为3组(每组n = 20),根管预备如下:第1组,用K锉进行手动预备;第2组,K锉连接由电动马达驱动的振荡系统;第3组,用由电动马达驱动的ProTaper镍钛旋转系统。为了比较不同技术产生的根管偏移,从每个根管根尖孔上方3 mm处的牙根横截面获取预备前和预备后的三维CT图像。CT扫描图像被导入Adobe Photoshop软件,将初始图像和最终图像叠加以检测两者之间的根管壁差异。通过测量预备后根管中心与解剖学根管中心之间的距离来测定根管偏移。手动技术产生的根管偏移(0.10 mm)小于振荡技术和旋转技术(分别为0.37 mm和0.22 mm);这种差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.021)。所有研究的技术均产生了根管偏移。