Effectiveness of chitosan nanoparticles, and novel chemical irrigants with surfactant on smear layer removal and microhardness alteration.

OBJECTIVE

This current study was designed to compare and correlate between smear layer eradication and reduction in microhardness by natural 0.2%chitosan nanoparticles and novel chemical irrigants with surfactant at the apical root third.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

One hundred and twenty straight single-rooted extracted lower premolars were decoronated and working length obtained with #10 K-file. Pro-taper rotary files were used till apical size F3. The canals were simultaneously flushed with assigned irrigant containing surfactant [(ChX-Ultra, NaOCl-Extra, Pro-EDTA, 0.2%chitosan nanoparticles, Biopure MTAD]. The samples were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 60). InGroup S (n = 60), the residual smear layer was examined by scanning electron microscope and in Group M(n = 60) microhardness was determined by Vickers Microhardness Tester. Further both groups were divided into six equal groups (n = 10 each) according to assigned irrigating solutions.For smear layer removal; Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by pair wise comparison using Mann Whitney test was done. For change in microhardness ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests was done.

RESULTS

Maximum smear layer removal was recorded in Biopure MTAD (1.8 ± 0.63), followed by pro-EDTA (2.2 0 ± 0.63) then 0.2%chitosan (2.6 ± 0.51), then NaOCL Extra (3.5 ± 0.53)and least in CHX-Ultra (4.4 ± 0.52) and saline (5.0 ± 0.00). Pro-EDTA group (12.8 ± 2.47) revealed significant highest reduction in microhardness followed by Biopure MTAD (8.01 ± 3.06), 0.2%chitosan nanoparticles (5.48 ± 2.87), NaOCl-Extra (5.44 ± 1.62) and least recorded in CHX-Ultra (4.94 ± 1.43) and saline (3.04 ± 0.63).

CONCLUSION

The elimination of the smear layer is always accompanied by a reduction in microhardness. Moreover, irrigant with surfactant and chelators enhanced smear layer removal, with best perceived in Biopure MTAD.