• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北卡罗来纳州的护理倡导。

Nursing advocacy in North Carolina.

作者信息

Gosselin-Acomb Tracy K, Schneider Susan M, Clough Robert W, Veenstra Brittney A

机构信息

Duke University Hospital, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Sep;34(5):1070-4. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.1070-1074.

DOI:10.1188/07.ONF.1070-1074
PMID:17878134
Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify the ways oncology nurses in one state advocate for patients, as well as the resources they use to do so.

DESIGN

Descriptive, cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

North Carolina.

SAMPLE

141 RNs in North Carolina who were members of the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS).

METHODS

Subjects completed a two-page, self-administered questionnaire comprised of fixed-choice and open-ended questions.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Demographics, frequency of advocating for patient services, and awareness of ONS resources.

FINDINGS

Nurses in North Carolina advocate for patients in a variety of ways. A need exists to develop ongoing methods to keep nurses up to date on advocacy issues, as well as to establish mentoring opportunities for them. Nurses believe that they are most challenged in addressing patients' financial and insurance concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncology nurses frequently advocate for patients' needs. The findings provide direction for future initiatives to educate nurses about their role in patient advocacy and available resources.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Ongoing education and research are needed to enhance the role of oncology nurses as patient advocates.

摘要

目的/目标:确定某一州的肿瘤护理护士为患者维权的方式以及他们用于维权的资源。

设计

描述性横断面调查。

地点

北卡罗来纳州。

样本

北卡罗来纳州141名身为肿瘤护理学会(ONS)成员的注册护士。

方法

受试者完成一份两页的自填式问卷,问卷包含固定选择和开放式问题。

主要研究变量

人口统计学信息、为患者服务维权的频率以及对ONS资源的认知。

研究结果

北卡罗来纳州的护士通过多种方式为患者维权。需要制定持续的方法以使护士了解最新的维权问题,并为他们建立指导机会。护士们认为在解决患者的财务和保险问题方面最具挑战性。

结论

肿瘤护理护士经常为患者的需求进行维权。研究结果为未来的倡议提供了方向,以教育护士了解他们在患者维权中的作用以及可用资源。

对护理工作的启示

需要持续的教育和研究来加强肿瘤护理护士作为患者维权者的作用。

相似文献

1
Nursing advocacy in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州的护理倡导。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Sep;34(5):1070-4. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.1070-1074.
2
Measuring oncology nurses' psychosocial care practices and needs: results of an Oncology Nursing Society psychosocial survey.评估肿瘤护理人员的心理社会护理实践与需求:肿瘤护理学会心理社会调查结果
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Nov;38(6):729-37. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.729-737.
3
Complementary and alternative medicine: oncology nurses' experiences, educational interests, and resources.补充与替代医学:肿瘤护理人员的经历、教育兴趣及资源
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006 May 3;33(3):581-8. doi: 10.1188/06.ONF.581-588.
4
The knowledge and attitudes of experience oncology nurses regarding the management of cancer-related pain.经验丰富的肿瘤护士对癌症相关疼痛管理的知识和态度。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Apr;23(3):515-21.
5
Oncology nurses' perceptions of obstacles and supportive behaviors at the end of life.肿瘤专科护士对临终阶段障碍及支持性行为的看法。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jul;36(4):446-53. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.446-453.
6
Use of research-based practices by oncology staff nurses.肿瘤专科护士对基于研究的实践方法的运用。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Sep;23(8):1235-44.
7
Hospice and hospital oncology unit nurses: a comparative survey of knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain.临终关怀机构与医院肿瘤科护士:关于癌症疼痛知识与态度的比较调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Nov-Dec;27(10):1593-9.
8
Spiritual care practices of oncology nurses.肿瘤护理人员的精神关怀实践。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jan-Feb;22(1):31-9.
9
1994 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.1994年肿瘤护理学会研究重点调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jun;22(5):785-9.
10
Caring for patients who experience chemotherapy-induced side effects: the meaning for oncology nurses.护理经历化疗副作用的患者:肿瘤护士的意义。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 Jun;26(5):901-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical problems experienced by oncology nurses.肿瘤护理人员所面临的伦理问题。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Nov-Dec;23(6):1187-94. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0098.2665.